2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecule Ideation Using Matched Molecular Pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the transformations shown in Figure , which produce highly active molecules against a given protein target, could be identified with a traditional matched molecular pairs (MMP) approach, ,, we sought to evaluate the ability of the proposed approach to go beyond MMP . Therefore, we first generated all MMP transformation rules (in the form of SMIRKS) for our training subset of ChEMBL molecules; expectedly, ,, the most ubiquitous of them were additions or replacements of single atoms (H, F, Cl, etc.) or simple groups (methyl, methoxy, ethyl, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the transformations shown in Figure , which produce highly active molecules against a given protein target, could be identified with a traditional matched molecular pairs (MMP) approach, ,, we sought to evaluate the ability of the proposed approach to go beyond MMP . Therefore, we first generated all MMP transformation rules (in the form of SMIRKS) for our training subset of ChEMBL molecules; expectedly, ,, the most ubiquitous of them were additions or replacements of single atoms (H, F, Cl, etc.) or simple groups (methyl, methoxy, ethyl, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far the most popular computational algorithm for lead optimization has arguably been MMP analysis . ,, This method is based on extraction of transformation rules from a training set of molecules, and application of these rules to known actives. Transformations captured in this way are generic, the method is based on the additivity principle, and yields multiple suggested molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, we compare our approach to MMP analysis, 3,4,16,19 a popular algorithm for lead optimization. This method is based on extraction of transformation rules from (in the terminology of ML) a training set of molecules, and application of these rules to known actives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we show that transformer models are not only able to generate new molecular structures absent from the training dataset, but, in doing so, also go beyond the standard matched molecular pairs (MMP)-based approach. 3,4,16 To demonstrate this, we first generated all MMP transformation rules (in the form of SMIRKS) for our training subset of ChEMBL 15 molecules; expectedly, 4,16 the most ubiquitous of them were additions or replacements of single atoms (H, F, Cl, etc.) or simple groups (methyl, methoxy, ethyl, etc.)…”
Section: Transformer Models Trained On Pairs Of Bioactive Molecules C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional strategies, such as scaffold hopping and bioisosteric replacement, mainly depend on the empirical chemical rules from medicinal chemists. , However, given the rising amount of data and complexity of chemical and biological systems, it is getting more difficult for medicinal chemists to manually extract related chemical rules . Accordingly, researchers developed many computational methods to automatically learn hidden medicinal chemistry knowledge from large data sets for the prediction and optimization of pharmacokinetic properties, such as machine learning-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models and matched molecular pairs analysis (MMPA). However, these strategies have certain limitations. For example, QSAR models cannot provide structural modification schemes, and MMPA can only be used to extract practical transformations from molecules sharing the same context .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%