2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecules and dust in Cassiopeia A

Abstract: We study the dust evolution in the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A. We follow the processing of dust grains that formed in the Type II-b supernova ejecta by modelling the sputtering of grains. The dust is located in dense ejecta clumps that are crossed by the reverse shock. We also investigate further sputtering in the inter-clump medium gas once the clumps have been disrupted by the reverse shock. The dust evolution in the dense ejecta clumps of Type II-P supernovae and their remnants is also explored. We stud… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
6
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Biscaro & Cherchneff (2016) derived a dust mass survival fraction between 6 and 11%, using the analytical model of Truelove & McKee (1999) and the SN dust composition and size distribution of Biscaro & Cherchneff (2014). All models discussed above (except Biscaro & Cherchneff 2016) assumed that the dust grains are embedded in homogeneous ejecta. Silvia et al (2010Silvia et al ( , 2012 performed 3D numerical simulations of the interaction of planar shocks with dense spherical clumps for a range of shock velocities, clump-ejecta density contrasts, and clump metallicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Biscaro & Cherchneff (2016) derived a dust mass survival fraction between 6 and 11%, using the analytical model of Truelove & McKee (1999) and the SN dust composition and size distribution of Biscaro & Cherchneff (2014). All models discussed above (except Biscaro & Cherchneff 2016) assumed that the dust grains are embedded in homogeneous ejecta. Silvia et al (2010Silvia et al ( , 2012 performed 3D numerical simulations of the interaction of planar shocks with dense spherical clumps for a range of shock velocities, clump-ejecta density contrasts, and clump metallicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The destruction efficiency, furthermore, seems to depend on grain composition, with average destroyed fractions of 20, 38, 80 and 100 % grains for Fe, C, SiO2 and Al2O3 grains (Silvia et al 2010), respectively. Biscaro & Cherchneff (2016) found that non-thermal sputtering in dust clumps in Cas A plays an important role in dust destruction and predicted that it would reduce the current SN dust mass by 40 to 80 %. The largest grain radii that they considered for the Cas A case were < 0.02 µm.…”
Section: Shock Destruction Of Sn Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cas A is a SNR of 340 years old and it is the only SNR in which both high-J rotational and ro-vibrational lines of warm CO gas have been detected (Rho et al 2012;Wallström et al 2013). Processing and evolution of dust and gas in SN ejecta after the explosion, in particular the effects of the reverse shock, have been becoming an important issue for the understanding of the net dust formation yield in SNe (Bianchi & Schneider 2007;Nozawa et al 2007Nozawa et al , 2010Nath et al 2008;Silvia et al 2010aSilvia et al , 2012Gall et al 2014;Dwek & Arendt 2015;Wesson et al 2015;Biscaro & Cherchneff 2016). Biscaro & Cherchneff (2014) show that dust and molecules in ejecta clumps are destroyed by the reverse shock, whereas CO gas can reform in the post-reverse shock gas, but dust clusters do not.…”
Section: Nature Of S2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biscaro & Cherchneff (2014) show that dust and molecules in ejecta clumps are destroyed by the reverse shock, whereas CO gas can reform in the post-reverse shock gas, but dust clusters do not. Processing of dust and gas in the post-reverse shock clumps depends sensitively on the environmental conditions (Biscaro & Cherchneff 2016). While no information is available of the SNR with which S2 is associated, if it is confirmed to be SN ejecta, further studies of S will provide important information on the study of the physical and chemical conditions of the ejecta.…”
Section: Nature Of S2mentioning
confidence: 99%