2021
DOI: 10.22541/au.162516703.32317228/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitored Anesthesia Care versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract: Background: Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) has been increasingly used in lieu of general anesthesia (GA) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to compare outcomes and in-hospital costs between MAC and GA for TAVR at a single center Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of 349 patients who underwent TAVR (MAC, n = 244 vs. GA, n = 105) from January 2014 to December 2019 was performed. Baseline patient characteristics, operating room (OR) time, inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 40 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?