2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring energy drift with shadow Hamiltonians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is strictly true for certain simple forms of H 0 but not for biomolecular force fields, where the asymptotic expansion eq 12 does not converge. For simulations with small energy drift, however, we find much encouragement in earlier work 25 that Hamiltonians defined by truncating eq 12 can describe the dynamics generated by the integrator extremely accurately. Nevertheless, an important part of this paper is to test numerically whether generalized equipartition holds.…”
Section: Equipartition For the Shadow Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is strictly true for certain simple forms of H 0 but not for biomolecular force fields, where the asymptotic expansion eq 12 does not converge. For simulations with small energy drift, however, we find much encouragement in earlier work 25 that Hamiltonians defined by truncating eq 12 can describe the dynamics generated by the integrator extremely accurately. Nevertheless, an important part of this paper is to test numerically whether generalized equipartition holds.…”
Section: Equipartition For the Shadow Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This unexpected result explains why the order of φ h is actually 2 numerically. Illuminating theoretical and numerical work onH can be found in Engle et al (2005) and Hairer et al (2006). Even though the infinite series inH generally diverges, they show the error in conservation of the first N terms inH, with N determined by h, is exponentially suppressed over exponentially long times.…”
Section: Derivation Of Methods and Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of potential and kinetic energy is given by 2) and this is shown to be independent of t in Appendix B. However, it is known that the Runge-Kutta integration scheme used in this paper is not energy conserving (Engle et al, 2005), hence in figure 6 we plot the percentage energy error and the total vessel energy…”
Section: Energy Budget For Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%