2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-012-9358-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring web services’ quality of service: a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, only the records that fulfill a minimum support count of 2 will be included into the next cycle of algorithm processing. (Han et al 2012) In many cases, the Apriori algorithm reduces the size of candidate itemsets significantly and provides a good performance gain. However, it is still suffering from two critical limitations (Han et al 2012).…”
Section: Apriori Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, only the records that fulfill a minimum support count of 2 will be included into the next cycle of algorithm processing. (Han et al 2012) In many cases, the Apriori algorithm reduces the size of candidate itemsets significantly and provides a good performance gain. However, it is still suffering from two critical limitations (Han et al 2012).…”
Section: Apriori Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Han et al 2012) In many cases, the Apriori algorithm reduces the size of candidate itemsets significantly and provides a good performance gain. However, it is still suffering from two critical limitations (Han et al 2012). First, a large number of candidate itemsets may still need to be generated if the total count of a frequent k-itemsets increases.…”
Section: Apriori Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These QoS values are provided during publication time by the service provider (P r(S i )) as the advertised QoS. They can be established by the system after a short period of service testing and monitoring (The system can use one of the approaches proposed in this survey [14]). Then, to bootstrap the reputation of the new service S i , the system goes through three phases: i) provider reputation evaluation, which is explained in Section III, ii) reputation estimation from similar services, which is described in Section IV, and iii) reputation estimation from multiple regression models built from QoS and reputation values of long-standing services in the system, which is detailed in Section V.…”
Section: Reputation Bootstrapping Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to that, we proposed a fuzzy-based model for web services' QoS monitoring using fuzzy interval type-2 (IT2) [5,6]. The main reason for proposing IT2-based monitoring system was to allow customers to specify their QoS requirements using linguistic definitions instead of exact numeric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%