Lanthanides and Actinides in Molecular Magnetism 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9783527673476.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mononuclear Lanthanide Complexes: Use of the Crystal Field Theory to Design Single‐Ion Magnets and Spin Qubits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the ability to tune the spatial arrangement of more than one non-identical SIM qubit (in the present example three structurally distinguishable SIMs are present) is precisely what is currently needed to advance in the global control paradigm of quantum computing. 78 On the other hand, the incorporation of functional molecular species into the pores can provide a convenient way for introducing a second property into these hybrid materials. …”
Section: Mofs With Single-molecule Magnets At the Inorganic Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the ability to tune the spatial arrangement of more than one non-identical SIM qubit (in the present example three structurally distinguishable SIMs are present) is precisely what is currently needed to advance in the global control paradigm of quantum computing. 78 On the other hand, the incorporation of functional molecular species into the pores can provide a convenient way for introducing a second property into these hybrid materials. …”
Section: Mofs With Single-molecule Magnets At the Inorganic Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From simple yet powerful electrostatic methods, 3,35 to computationally inexpensive CF approaches, 24,[36][37][38] to more computationally demanding ab initio CASSCF/RASSI methods, [39][40][41] there is a vibrant debate regarding the theoretical approaches to rationalizing -or predicting -the magnetic properties of Ln-SMMs. 8,[42][43][44] Ab initio CASSCF/RASSI methods have an intrinsically higher heuristic value as they aim for an accurate description of the wavefunctions, relying on virtually no empirical data beyond the atomic positions obtained from crystal structure determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy barrier to magnetization reversal determined by an Arrhenius plot is reported to be . 4.8 meV 36,42,54,55.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be successful for describing low-temperature properties, but inevitably fails for understanding the magnetic susceptibility, or the relaxation properties of SMMs [11,37,52]. Alternatively, semi-empirical models such as the point-charge model or improved versions of it [17,24,53] can be used, which promise fewer parameters, but introduce hard to control approximations. They thus typically need to be "calibrated" by a large data set, which may not be available [24].…”
Section: Challenges Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, semi-empirical models such as the point-charge model or improved versions of it [17,24,53] can be used, which promise fewer parameters, but introduce hard to control approximations. They thus typically need to be "calibrated" by a large data set, which may not be available [24].…”
Section: Challenges Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%