2018
DOI: 10.1525/collabra.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Framing and Charitable Donation: Integrating Exploratory Social Media Analyses and Confirmatory Experimentation

Abstract: Do appeals to moral values promote charitable donation during natural disasters? Using Distributed Dictionary Representation, we analyze tweets posted during Hurricane Sandy to explore associations between moral values and charitable donation sentiment. We then derive hypotheses from the observed associations and test these hypotheses across a series of preregistered experiments that investigate the effects of moral framing on perceived donation motivation (Studies 2 & 3), hypothetical donation (Study 4), and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a third category of moral reframing research has explored its efficacy in shaping liberals' and conservatives' attitudes on issues that are largely nonpolitical or, at least, not strongly aligned with either liberal or conservative political ideologies. These studies have targeted outcomes like vaccine hesitancy, diversity and inclusion, and stem cell technology (Amin et al, 2017;Brannon, Carter, Murdock-Perriera, & Higginbotham, 2018;Clifford, Jerit, Rainey, & Motyl, 2015;Hoover et al, 2018;Kljajic & Feinberg, 2019;Lee, Yoon, Lee, & Royne, 2018;Winterich, Mittal, & Aquino, 2013). Along these lines, a handful of studies have examined the effects of moral reframing on liberals' and conservatives' tendencies to donate money to different types of charities.…”
Section: A Review Of Moral Reframing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a third category of moral reframing research has explored its efficacy in shaping liberals' and conservatives' attitudes on issues that are largely nonpolitical or, at least, not strongly aligned with either liberal or conservative political ideologies. These studies have targeted outcomes like vaccine hesitancy, diversity and inclusion, and stem cell technology (Amin et al, 2017;Brannon, Carter, Murdock-Perriera, & Higginbotham, 2018;Clifford, Jerit, Rainey, & Motyl, 2015;Hoover et al, 2018;Kljajic & Feinberg, 2019;Lee, Yoon, Lee, & Royne, 2018;Winterich, Mittal, & Aquino, 2013). Along these lines, a handful of studies have examined the effects of moral reframing on liberals' and conservatives' tendencies to donate money to different types of charities.…”
Section: A Review Of Moral Reframing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already, portions of this corpus have facilitated advances in both theoretical and methodological research. For example, Hoover et al (2018) relies on the Hurricane Sandy annotations to investigate the relationship between charitable donation and moral framing, and Mooijman et al (2018) uses the Baltimore Protest annotations to predict violent protest from online moral rhetoric. These annotation sets have also been used for recent work advancing methods for measuring sentiment in natural language (Garten, Boghrati, Hoover, Johnson, & Dehghani, 2016;Garten et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Moral Foundations Twitter Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, as noted above, these domains were selected to maximize the base rates of moral sentiment, the proportion of tweets containing moral sentiment within each domain was still too low to use MORAL FOUNDATIONS TWITTER CORPUS fully randomized sampling. Accordingly, our general sampling procedure relied on a combination of random sampling and semi-supervised selection as in Garten et al (2018); Hoover et al (2018).…”
Section: Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, as noted above, these domains were selected to maximize the base rates of moral sentiment, the proportion of tweets containing moral sentiment within each domain was still too low to use fully randomized sampling. Accordingly, our general sampling procedure relied on a combination of random sampling and semi-supervised selection as in Garten et al (2018); Hoover et al (2018).…”
Section: Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%