2013
DOI: 10.1179/1752270612y.0000000028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More efficient methods among commonly used robust estimation methods for GPS coordinate transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors analyzed two variants of gross error occurrence: in bearing NR 2 (Fig. 4a) and NR 3 (Fig. 4b).…”
Section: Fig 3 Position Of a Measurement Unit Determined On The Basmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors analyzed two variants of gross error occurrence: in bearing NR 2 (Fig. 4a) and NR 3 (Fig. 4b).…”
Section: Fig 3 Position Of a Measurement Unit Determined On The Basmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the method of M split estimation is a generalization of a wide class of M-estimation methods, it may be analyzed in a context similar for the classic, robust M-estimation (Wiśniewski 2009, Ge et al 2013). The parameter estimation method in the split functional model presumes that each observation y 1 may be a realization of one out of two competitive random variables (1) (1)Ỹ P X and ( 2) (2)Ỹ P X (Wiśniewski 2009, Zienkiewicz, Baryła 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper considers four variants of weight functions of robust M-estimation (see e.g. Krarup, Kubik 1983;Labant et al 2011;Ge et al 2013;Nowel 2016):…”
Section: Robust M-estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M split estimation, can also be regarded as a method of robust estimation (see e.g. Wiśniewski 2009;Ge et al 2013;Zienkiewicz 2014). Robust methods of observation adjustment, included in the class of M-estimation, are particularly important from the perspective of navigational measurement structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%