2016
DOI: 10.15260/rbc.v6i1.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morfometria geométrica alar como ferramenta para a identificação de Lucilia sericata e Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Abstract: Lucilia sericata (Meigen) e Calliphora vicina (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera, Calliphoridae) estão entre as espécies de dípteros de interesse forense. A correta identificação do espécime, ou fragmento deste, coletado em um local de crime é etapa fundamental para o emprego da entomologia forense em investigações criminais. Nesse estudo, avaliou-se a possibilidade de discriminação entre duas espécies de califorídeos pela morfologia alar, por meio de análises de morfometria geométrica. Foram analisadas as asas esqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphometrics is quantitatively researching the relationship between biological shape, variation and covariation of shape and other abiotic or biotic factors (Webster and Sheets, 2010). Landmark based Geometric Morphometric (GMM) analysis has been conducted on butterfly wings (Roggero and Entreves, 2005;Breuker et al, 2010), various non-necrophagous fly wings (Klingenberg et al, 1998;Haas and Tolley, 1998;Hall et al, 2014;Pepinelli et al, 2013;Sadeghi and Kiany, 2012), Psychodidae (De la Riva et al, 2001), cricket wings (Klingenberg et al, 2010), culicid mosquito (Sanchez et al, 2017) and necrophagous fly wings (Vásquez and Liria, 2012;Macedo, 2016;Nuñez-Rodríguez and Liria, 2017;Sontigun et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphometrics is quantitatively researching the relationship between biological shape, variation and covariation of shape and other abiotic or biotic factors (Webster and Sheets, 2010). Landmark based Geometric Morphometric (GMM) analysis has been conducted on butterfly wings (Roggero and Entreves, 2005;Breuker et al, 2010), various non-necrophagous fly wings (Klingenberg et al, 1998;Haas and Tolley, 1998;Hall et al, 2014;Pepinelli et al, 2013;Sadeghi and Kiany, 2012), Psychodidae (De la Riva et al, 2001), cricket wings (Klingenberg et al, 2010), culicid mosquito (Sanchez et al, 2017) and necrophagous fly wings (Vásquez and Liria, 2012;Macedo, 2016;Nuñez-Rodríguez and Liria, 2017;Sontigun et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric studies on categorising necrophagous fly species wings have been conducted in Venezuela (Vásquez and Liria, 2012;Nuñez-Rodríguez and Liria, 2017), Brazil (Macedo, 2016) and Thailand (Sontigun et al, 2017). Table 1 summarises the previous research on necrophagous fly species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%