Proceedings Ninth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications. Pacific Graphics 2001
DOI: 10.1109/pccga.2001.962856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphing stick figures using optimized compatible triangulations

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from this grand challenge our algorithms could be improved in a number of ways. First, ensuring that self-intersections do not occur during a morph can be accomplished by utilizing the algorithm of Surazhsky and Gotsman (2001b) to compute non-linear trajectories to morph points. Further investigation would be necessary to avoid intersections between different polylines in a network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from this grand challenge our algorithms could be improved in a number of ways. First, ensuring that self-intersections do not occur during a morph can be accomplished by utilizing the algorithm of Surazhsky and Gotsman (2001b) to compute non-linear trajectories to morph points. Further investigation would be necessary to avoid intersections between different polylines in a network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give a heuristic method in Section 3.3.4 that may be implemented to avoid some typical cases of selfintersections, namely if a pair of corresponding segments would intersect; intersections may still occur in some cases between two different parts of the same polyline or between different polylines in a network. The method of Surazhsky and Gotsman (2001b), who give a solution to the trajectory problem, provides a workaround to this issue by computing more complex but therefore intersection-free trajectories given our solution to the correspondence problem. Since self-intersections were not an issue in the examples of our case study we refrained from including their method in our prototype implementation.…”
Section: Model and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the triangulations in which simple polygons are embedded are constructed by compatibly triangulating the interior of the polygons and an annular region in the exterior of the polygon between the polygon boundary and a fixed convex enclosure. See Surazhsky and Gotsman 2001] for more details. These works have yet to be extended to morph planar figures with arbitrary (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for image warping), then a fixed common convex boundary might be restrictive. Fortunately, using the methods of Surazhsky and Gotsman 2001], it is possible to overcome this by embedding the source and target triangulations with different boundaries, in two larger triangulations with a common fixed boundary. In practice this is done by compatibly triangulating the annulus between the original and new boundary, possibly introducing Steiner vertices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 These coordinates reflect the shapes of triangles in a way similar to coordinates 17,18,19,16 produce triangulations that may have long, skinny and close to degenerate triangles together with many additional (Steiner ) vertices. Moreover, the resulting compatible triangulations must usually be refined in order to create more natural morphing sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%