2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-020-01445-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and DNA analyses suggest the reinstatement of four synonymized Cecropia species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, notable morphological and chemical differences were found in the 2 morphotypes described in C. obtusifolia, suggesting that these 2 groups may deserve a different taxonomic recognition [41]. Moreover, Santos et al [42], through morphological and molecular data, showed major differences between C. pachystachya synonymized morphotypes, which raises the need for a taxonomic and nomenclatural revision of the C. pachystachya complex and subsequent reestablishment of at least 4 synonymized taxa (i.e., C. adenopus Mart. ex Miq., C. digitata Klotzsch, C. lyratiloba Miq., and C. catarinensis Cuatrec).…”
Section: Classification Taxonomy and Geographical Distribution Of The Genus Cecropiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, notable morphological and chemical differences were found in the 2 morphotypes described in C. obtusifolia, suggesting that these 2 groups may deserve a different taxonomic recognition [41]. Moreover, Santos et al [42], through morphological and molecular data, showed major differences between C. pachystachya synonymized morphotypes, which raises the need for a taxonomic and nomenclatural revision of the C. pachystachya complex and subsequent reestablishment of at least 4 synonymized taxa (i.e., C. adenopus Mart. ex Miq., C. digitata Klotzsch, C. lyratiloba Miq., and C. catarinensis Cuatrec).…”
Section: Classification Taxonomy and Geographical Distribution Of The Genus Cecropiamentioning
confidence: 99%