2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(99)00077-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological, phenological and water-use dynamics of sorghum varieties (Sorghum bicolor) under Striga hermonthica infestation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such late attachments could be attributed to the mechanical resistance mechanism of the N13 donor conferred by its Striga resistance QTL alleles. Gebremedhin et al (2000) also reported delayed emergence of Striga on resistant sorghum compared to a susceptible variety. The genetic differences between the sorghum genotypes have been reported to affect the time of parasite attachment, with resistant varieties showing later attachment and parasite emergence than susceptible cultivars (Ezeaku and Gupta, 2004;Rodenburg et al, 2006).…”
Section: Field Evaluation Of Bc 3 F 3 Linesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such late attachments could be attributed to the mechanical resistance mechanism of the N13 donor conferred by its Striga resistance QTL alleles. Gebremedhin et al (2000) also reported delayed emergence of Striga on resistant sorghum compared to a susceptible variety. The genetic differences between the sorghum genotypes have been reported to affect the time of parasite attachment, with resistant varieties showing later attachment and parasite emergence than susceptible cultivars (Ezeaku and Gupta, 2004;Rodenburg et al, 2006).…”
Section: Field Evaluation Of Bc 3 F 3 Linesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gebremedhin et al . () found that root growth differed in susceptible (IS9302) and resistant (SRN 39) sorghum genotypes under S . hermonthica infested environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It grows under severe moisture and nutrient stress in areas where it is difficult to grow other food grains (FAO 1997), and where the resource base of the farmer is poor (Gebremedhin et al 2000). Although several improved varieties have been developed and released, yield gains at farmer level are minimal, with average grain yields that are still only about 0.85 t/ha (FAO 1997), in spite of the more than 2 t/ha yield potential of most cultivars (Ahmed et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%