2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological recovery of beach severely damaged by the 2011 great east Japan tsunami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid recovery of the beach north of Meulaboh documented here is consistent with observations of post tsunami beach recovery after the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami in Japan [8] and at Lampu Uk, the bay immediately north to Leupung 60% of the sediment lost due to the tsunami was regained within 6 months [16]. This rapid beach recovery has also been seen in Thailand after the 2004 IOT [3,7,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The rapid recovery of the beach north of Meulaboh documented here is consistent with observations of post tsunami beach recovery after the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami in Japan [8] and at Lampu Uk, the bay immediately north to Leupung 60% of the sediment lost due to the tsunami was regained within 6 months [16]. This rapid beach recovery has also been seen in Thailand after the 2004 IOT [3,7,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A very high correlation (squared correlation coefficient, R 2 = 0.84) between the amount of sudden retreat and subsidence was observed, as shown in Figure 7a. Based on the estimation, the retreats were reducing from north to south (from #1 to #8, the Figure 7), which may be dependent on cross-shore sediment transport generated by sudden subsidence, or relative sea level rise, as reported in Hoang et al, (2019) [12]. A regular survey on shoreline position at the Hasaki Research Pier (HORS), located approximately 100 km south of Ibaraki, reports that the coast did not experience an obvious retreat, while subsidence caused by the earthquake was approximately 0.2 m [13].…”
Section: Shoreline Change: Retreat Due To Subsidence and Tsunamimentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Attempting to help the recovery of the coast and reduce the effects of a future tsunami to the hinterland, local governments along the Honshu Island have proposed an earthquake disaster reconstruction plan [12]. For example, the repair of coastal structures (2016-2019), as seen at the Ariake, can be an important factor for shoreline advancement (see Figure 6c).…”
Section: Shoreline Change: Remaining Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant wave directions indicate that before any anthropogenic processes, the main direction of the alongshore drift on the Sendai Coast is from the south to the north starting from the Abukuma River mouth to the end of the littoral drift at the Sendai Port. According to the field measurement of accumulative sediment from Sawamoto [19], after the construction of the Yuriage Port, the sediment bypassing rate from the updrift through the port to the northern coast is equal to zero. Further investigations conducted by Widyaningtia et al [25] provided the depth of closure (DoC) value in the port to be from 12 to 14 m, which is much bigger than the average DoC of 8 m on the Sendai Coast [26].…”
Section: Field Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monecke et al [11] simulated the cross-shore profile change under the prevailing hydrodynamic conditions to investigate the recovery process, while Martínez et al [12] applied a more complicated sediment transport model (Delft3D) in conjunction with morphology and topography data analysis to discuss the erosive behavior of the microtidal Tubul-Raqui wetland in south-central Chile. In Japan, more thorough and multidisciplinary research of the coastal and riverine damage and recovery after the tsunami was conducted using the sufficient availability of both pre-and post-tsunami data [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%