1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67044-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric Analysis and Clinical Followup of Isolated Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Needle Biopsy of the Prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15,22 Thus, in a study of 65 radical prostatectomy specimens, high grade PIN was found not to contribute to elevated serum PSA 23 and other recent studies also suggest that PIN alone does not increase the serum PSA. 1,24 We observed similar serum PSA levels in men with benign histological ®ndings and those with high grade PIN, and higher levels in men with cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…15,22 Thus, in a study of 65 radical prostatectomy specimens, high grade PIN was found not to contribute to elevated serum PSA 23 and other recent studies also suggest that PIN alone does not increase the serum PSA. 1,24 We observed similar serum PSA levels in men with benign histological ®ndings and those with high grade PIN, and higher levels in men with cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This indicates that the prostate cancer risk is increased with the increase in the number of specimens found to have HGPIN on the 1 st biopsy. Our result also agreed with that of Bostwick et al [2], Abdel-khalek et al [23] and Rosser et al [27], However, it disagreed with studies that revealed lower prostate detection rate (De Nunzio et al [22], Kamoi et al [28] and Epstein & Herawi [29]) and other studies with higher prostate detection rate (Keetch et al [30] and Borboroglu et al [25]). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Other series have also found a high predictive value of PIN for cancer, although recent reports based on obtaining a greater number of cores shows a lower predictive value (Table 4). 51,[54][55][56][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158] These data underscore the strong association of PIN and adenocarcinoma and indicate that vigorous diagnostic follow up is needed.…”
Section: Men With Pin Develop Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%