1988
DOI: 10.1002/path.1711560205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric analysis of coronary artery stenosis: An accuracy and reliability study

Abstract: Luminal narrowing was assessed in 238 transverse segments obtained from coronary arteries removed at postmortem. In each segment, narrowing was assessed by gross visual estimation before and after fixation, and on histological sections by stereological point counting and computer-assisted planimetry. Computer-assisted planimetry was found to be accurate and reliable but the equipment needed is expensive, and requires specialized software and an experienced user. Morphometric measurement by stereologic point co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the fact that gross examination is only able to accurately assess stenosis when it is less than 30% or more than 70%. 7,16,29 The findings of this study support this since when the microscopic assessment was <75% there was the least correlation between the two methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This may be due to the fact that gross examination is only able to accurately assess stenosis when it is less than 30% or more than 70%. 7,16,29 The findings of this study support this since when the microscopic assessment was <75% there was the least correlation between the two methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Accuracy can be improved by a visual aid, similar to that in Fig. 1 [20]. Ideally, gross assessments should be confirmed by histology, taking the internal elastic lamina as the original lumen size.…”
Section: Stenosis Due To Stable (Not Thrombosed) Plaquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of intimal and medial cross-sectional areas (mm2) were made by a skilled observer blinded to the treatment groups. An eyepiece grid with 100 counting points (line intersections), each 0.4 mm apart, was used (25,26 …”
Section: Histomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%