2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality in systolic heart failure revisited: Ischemic versus non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, as a result of the strict inclusion criteria the patients in our study had a smaller LV dimension, specifically LVESV; on the other hand, all patients in our study were diagnosed with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy, which has been proven to be associated with better prognosis in heart failure compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy with or without CRT. [19][20][21] Last but not the least, the results of our study supported the safety of short-term (≤ 3 months) cessation of pacing for CRT superresponders, for instance, in scenarios when pocket infection occurs and the generator needs to be retracted and sterilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, as a result of the strict inclusion criteria the patients in our study had a smaller LV dimension, specifically LVESV; on the other hand, all patients in our study were diagnosed with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy, which has been proven to be associated with better prognosis in heart failure compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy with or without CRT. [19][20][21] Last but not the least, the results of our study supported the safety of short-term (≤ 3 months) cessation of pacing for CRT superresponders, for instance, in scenarios when pocket infection occurs and the generator needs to be retracted and sterilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is worth mentioning that our study showed only decrease in LVEF after 6 months without pacing; in contrast, all clinical and echocardiographic parameters deteriorated after the same time course in the report by Cay et al The difference in disease progression between the studies could probably be attributed to the difference in characteristics of recruited participants. On the one hand, as a result of the strict inclusion criteria the patients in our study had a smaller LV dimension, specifically LVESV; on the other hand, all patients in our study were diagnosed with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy, which has been proven to be associated with better prognosis in heart failure compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy with or without CRT …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies show similar prognosis in such patients24 while a US-based study showed that ICMP has a worse prognosis 25. A recent randomised trial of patients with NICMP comparing ICD therapy to no ICD showed greater than 90% survival at 2 years in both groups 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of coronary artery disease in Indonesia has increased from 0.5% in 2013 to 1.5% in 2018 [ 2 ]. Ischemic cardiomyopathy has a worse prognosis than non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a 5-year survival rate at as high as 50% while non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is 33% [ 3 ]. The most common cause of death in ischemic cardiomyopathy is progressivity of heart failure and sudden cardiac death [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%