“…Of the 66 cases 2,3,5–9,11–16,18–22,24–27,29–35,42,43,45–49,51–53,55,57–61,63–68 that reported the sex of the infant, 37 (56.1%) 2,6,8,9,12,13,19–22,25,26,29,31–35,42,47,51,52,58,60,63,66,67 were males. Seven (8.0%) infants 12,14,17,29,48,51,54 were part of a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy whilst one (1.1%) infant 4 was from a monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy.…”