2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200101)24:1<4::aid-mus13>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor unit physiology: Some unresolved issues

Abstract: The purpose of this review was to examine three issues that limit our understanding of motor unit physiology: (1) the range and distribution of the innervation ratios in a muscle; (2) the association between discharge rate and force; and (3) the variation in motor unit activity across contractions that differ in speed and type. We suggest that if more data were available on these issues, the understanding of neuromuscular function would be enhanced substantially, especially with regard to plasticity in the mot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
222
3
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(199 reference statements)
13
222
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the changes in contraction force occurring during the larval-larval molt were not due to simple disruption of the rhythmic output of the FG. We also failed to detect changes in motorneuron firing frequency or spike number typically associated with the modulation of muscle contraction force (Morris and Hooper, 1997;Enoka and Fuglevand, 2001). Also, our recordings of the kinetics of the muscle EJP activity revealed no differences between earlymolt and intermolt stage larvae (Tables 1-3).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Foregut Modulation During the Moltmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, the changes in contraction force occurring during the larval-larval molt were not due to simple disruption of the rhythmic output of the FG. We also failed to detect changes in motorneuron firing frequency or spike number typically associated with the modulation of muscle contraction force (Morris and Hooper, 1997;Enoka and Fuglevand, 2001). Also, our recordings of the kinetics of the muscle EJP activity revealed no differences between earlymolt and intermolt stage larvae (Tables 1-3).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Foregut Modulation During the Moltmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Moreover, referring to a compilation of MUAP rates in a review article by Enoka and Fuglevand (2001) they assumed a MUAP rate of 25/s per motor unit. For the ensemble of all contributing motor units they consequently estimated a MUAP rate between 1250/s and 2500/s.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Muap Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the number of muscle fibers innervated by a motor unit has a skewed distribution. For example, the first dorsal interosseus muscle comprises an equal number of type I and II fibers, but ϳ84% of the motor units have slow contraction times and are fatigue resistant (7). Fourth, the conduction velocity of muscle fiber action potentials can change by ϳ20% with variation in discharge rate (24) and the range of discharge rates varies with recruitment threshold in a population of motor units (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%