2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moyamoya Disease in a Six Month Caucasian Female

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, de novo RNF213 gene mutations located in the E3 ligase have recently been reported in several severe infant onset MA cases. [27][28][29]106 Liver, kidney and skin clinical manifestations are often associated with cerebrovascular manifestations in those infants leading to diagnosis delay and unneeded investigations.…”
Section: Expert Consensus Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, de novo RNF213 gene mutations located in the E3 ligase have recently been reported in several severe infant onset MA cases. [27][28][29]106 Liver, kidney and skin clinical manifestations are often associated with cerebrovascular manifestations in those infants leading to diagnosis delay and unneeded investigations.…”
Section: Expert Consensus Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had also no evidence to support the clinical utility of performing the genetic screening of p.R.4810K include' variant of RNF213 gene' (PICO3), despite the fact that it could be useful to look for other variants in the RNF213 gene in children with a very early onset and severe disease. [27][28][29]112 Since it has been observed that MMA stenoocclusive lesions progress over the years conditioning ischaemic and haemorrhagic clinical events and that unilateral MMA may evolve to bilateral conditions, the MWG agreed in suggesting the neuroimaging assessment of disease progression (MRI, MRA, cerebral perfusion imaging and DSA), based on the potential need for a therapeutic decision (PICO9). However, also in this case most of the papers reviewed were not comparative studies (i.e.…”
Section: Expert Consensus Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation