2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPLBM-UT: Multiphase LBM library for permeable media analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the computational cost of LBM and the need for the use of higher resolution image for through-plane direction for a fibrous material with binder, the in-plane permeability was calculated for a smaller domain of [500, 500, 280] voxels, which was cropped from the image. LBM simulation was performed using an open-source package MPLBM-UT, 54 which is built upon the open-source package Palabos. 55 To apply a single-phase simulation, a constant pressure gradient was defined between the inlet and outlet of the domain.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the computational cost of LBM and the need for the use of higher resolution image for through-plane direction for a fibrous material with binder, the in-plane permeability was calculated for a smaller domain of [500, 500, 280] voxels, which was cropped from the image. LBM simulation was performed using an open-source package MPLBM-UT, 54 which is built upon the open-source package Palabos. 55 To apply a single-phase simulation, a constant pressure gradient was defined between the inlet and outlet of the domain.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulators and solvers used to produce the data presented here have been individually and externally validated. For the single phase flow simulations, the LBM-LEV simulator 70 implemented in 71 was utilized. This simulator has been extensively validated in 40 , 70 , 72 – 75 .…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code used for the geometry curation and standarization, and plotting can be found at https://github.com/je-santos/Large-simulation-dataset . The fluid flow simulations were performed using 71 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test the contact angle algorithm and the free surface assumptions for our LBM model, tests were run comparing the results to a more standard two-phase LBM model: the Shan-Chen model more commonly used in the literature. 38,99,100 Briefly, 69 if one defines the macroscopic velocity u eq as: Here, w i is the weighting at each voxel i, and G c and G ads are the interparticle constant for cohesion and adhesion, respectively. This parameter is often between −2.0 and 2.0.…”
Section: Simulation Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our purposes, the density ratio is 2:1-this allows for a comparison where the Shan-Chen model is valid. The Shan-Chen model is adapted from work done by Santos et al 100 This test involves modeling a single water drop on a surface of varying contact angles and measuring the curvature of the drop. In Shan-Chen models, typically this is varied with the interparticle force constant G for a linear relationship-here, we will compare the drops in the two models to show how well they model contact angle.…”
Section: Simulation Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%