2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR angiography can guide ED management of suspected acute aortic dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity and specificity of CT are excellent [50], but in patients with poor renal function or allergy to iodinated dye, CT angiography is questionable and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography can be considered instead. On the other hand, MRI is seldom used-as it is too time-consuming and still often unavailable, but it may complement CT angiography in follow-up imaging of the aorta [51].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of CT are excellent [50], but in patients with poor renal function or allergy to iodinated dye, CT angiography is questionable and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography can be considered instead. On the other hand, MRI is seldom used-as it is too time-consuming and still often unavailable, but it may complement CT angiography in follow-up imaging of the aorta [51].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is important to remember that both CT angiography and first-pass MRI have been shown to overestimate the amount of false lumen thrombosis by up to sixfold when compared to more advanced although not commonly available MRI protocols [19], hence the need for a high degree of circumspection when interpreting those investigations [16]. MR is a fastevolving technology, and it will certainly play an increasingly important role in acute aortic syndromes [20].…”
Section: Mr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not the imaging modality of choice in diagnosis or long-term follow up for these conditions (25). Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be used as an alternative to CTA in select cases when ionizing radiation or allergic reactions to iodinated intravenous contrast agents are to be avoided (26). Non-contrast MRA can also be performed in patients with renal dysfunction (26).…”
Section: Imaging Of Aas/aortic Emergenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be used as an alternative to CTA in select cases when ionizing radiation or allergic reactions to iodinated intravenous contrast agents are to be avoided (26). Non-contrast MRA can also be performed in patients with renal dysfunction (26). The strengths and weaknesses of different imaging modalities have been summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Imaging Of Aas/aortic Emergenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%