2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR Arthrography versus conventional MRI in evaluation of labral and chondral lesions in different types of femoroacetabular impingement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] The gold standard diagnostic imaging modality for labral tears is magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or nonarthrographic HR MRI [9,31]. Studies have established that MRA, when infused with gadolinium, has a sensitivity of approximately 90% [32,33]. It retains an advantage over conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, the sensitivity of 83%) for the diagnosis of acetabular and cartilage defects [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] The gold standard diagnostic imaging modality for labral tears is magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or nonarthrographic HR MRI [9,31]. Studies have established that MRA, when infused with gadolinium, has a sensitivity of approximately 90% [32,33]. It retains an advantage over conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, the sensitivity of 83%) for the diagnosis of acetabular and cartilage defects [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this review, such abnormalities were confirmed using MRA with 90% sensitivity [ 24 ]. Recently, usage of other imaging modalities such as MRI and computed tomography (CT) has increased [ 28 ]. A 2017 study noted that sensitivity for detecting labral tears from conventional MRI was 70% compared with 95% for MRA, showing that MRA appears to be superior to MRI when assessing labral tears [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, usage of other imaging modalities such as MRI and computed tomography (CT) has increased [ 28 ]. A 2017 study noted that sensitivity for detecting labral tears from conventional MRI was 70% compared with 95% for MRA, showing that MRA appears to be superior to MRI when assessing labral tears [ 28 ]. Unlike MRI, CT provides improvements in detailing bony features of hip disorders [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It achieves a high sensitivity and specificity for labral tear identification of 95% and 92%, respectively, and of 94% and 91%, respectively, for chondral lesions. [36] Despite the success of invasive imaging, arthroscopy still retains a diagnostic role, albeit limited, especially in the case of undiagnosed hip and groin pain where all the investigations are equivocal, and it is the gold standard test for the identification of intra-articular pathology.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%