Mubug: a mobile service for rapid bug tracking

Feng, Yang; Liu, Qin; Dou, Mengyu; Liu, Jia; Chen, Zhenyu

doi:10.1007/s11432-015-5506-4

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the remaining revisions of subject projects, we differentiated bug-fix commits from non-bugfix commits. One practical method is by mining the issue-tracking system and commit messages to identify the revisions committed for fixing bugs [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. First of all, we extracted bug issues from the issue-tracking system by selecting bug-related label names.…”

Section: Analysis Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

A study on the changes of dynamic feature code when fixing bugs: towards the benefits and costs of Python dynamic features

Chen

Wei

et al. 2017

Sci. China Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dynamic features in programming languages support the modification of the execution status at runtime, which is often considered helpful in rapid development and prototyping. However, it was also reported that some dynamic feature code tends to be change-prone or error-prone. We present the first study that analyzes the changes of dynamic feature code and the roles of dynamic features in bug-fix activities for the Python language. We used an AST-based differencing tool to capture fine-grained source code changes from 17926 bug-fix commits in 17 Python projects. Using this data, we conducted an empirical study on the changes of dynamic feature code when fixing bugs in Python. First, we investigated the characteristics of dynamic feature code changes, by comparing the changes between dynamic feature code and non-dynamic feature code when fixing bugs, and comparing dynamic feature changes between bug-fix and non-bugfix activities. Second, we explored 226 bug-fix commits to investigate the motivation and behaviors of dynamic feature changes when fixing bugs. The study results reveal that (1) the changes of dynamic feature code are significantly related to bug-fix activities rather than non-bugfix activities; (2) compared with non-dynamic feature code, dynamic feature code is inserted or updated more frequently when fixing bugs; (3) developers often insert dynamic feature code as type checks or attribute checks to fix type errors and attribute errors; (4) the misuse of dynamic features introduces bugs in dynamic feature code, and the bugs are often fixed by adding a check or adding an exception handling. As a benefit of this paper, we gain insights into the manner in which developers and researchers handle the changes of dynamic feature code when fixing bugs. Keywords Python, fine-grained code changes, change behaviors, dynamic features, bug fixing Citation Chen Z F, Ma W W Y, Lin W, et al. A study on the changes of dynamic feature code when fixing bugs: towards the benefits and costs of Python dynamic features.

show abstract