2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MUC4 interacts with ErbB2 in human gallbladder carcinoma: Potential pathobiological implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When all studies were included (regardless of applying ISH for “selected” or “unselected” population), mean HER2 amplification rate was statistically significantly higher in patients with EH-BTCs compared to IHCCs (Table 4). Interestingly, the mean HER2 amplification rate was higher in the five studies [59, 68, 72, 73, 78] in which ISH test was performed in “selected” population when compared to the 12 studies in which ISH test was applied to “unselected population” only [17.9 % (95 % CI 0.1–35.4 %) vs. 57.6 % (95 % CI 16.2–99 %), p value 0.0072] [55, 56, 59, 63, 64, 66, 77, 8083, 85] (Table 4). Nakazawa et al reported data from 221 patients, 71 of whom had FISH testing performed: meaningful differences in HER2 amplification rate were shown between “unselected” [15/71 (21 %)] and “selected” [15/19 (79 %)] populations [59] (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When all studies were included (regardless of applying ISH for “selected” or “unselected” population), mean HER2 amplification rate was statistically significantly higher in patients with EH-BTCs compared to IHCCs (Table 4). Interestingly, the mean HER2 amplification rate was higher in the five studies [59, 68, 72, 73, 78] in which ISH test was performed in “selected” population when compared to the 12 studies in which ISH test was applied to “unselected population” only [17.9 % (95 % CI 0.1–35.4 %) vs. 57.6 % (95 % CI 16.2–99 %), p value 0.0072] [55, 56, 59, 63, 64, 66, 77, 8083, 85] (Table 4). Nakazawa et al reported data from 221 patients, 71 of whom had FISH testing performed: meaningful differences in HER2 amplification rate were shown between “unselected” [15/71 (21 %)] and “selected” [15/19 (79 %)] populations [59] (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ErbB2 itself has been shown to be significantly overexpressed in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (45,46) and to regulate inflammatory and cell viability pathways, e.g., by NFκB (47). MUC4 has thus been demonstrated to stimulate proliferation pathways and to inhibit apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic drugs in different cancer cell lines (27,34,48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 With its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains, MUC4 acts as a modulator of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ErbB2) receptor tyrosine kinase and facilitate tumorigenesis and/or tumor growth in pancreatic carcinoma 12 and gallbladder carcinoma. 13 The prognostic significance of MUC4 expression is tissue-dependent and varies with the type of malignancy. For example, it has been shown that MUC4 expression was related to aggressive tumor behavior or a poor outcome in lung adenocarcinoma, 14 ovarian cancer, 15 and breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%