1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐centre evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of the direct agglutination test for visceral leishmaniasis

Abstract: Summaryobjective To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the serological direct agglutination test (DAT) for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) with aqueous antigen in a multi-centre study in VL-endemic areas in Sudan, Kenya and Nepal.methods Repeatability within each centre and reproducibility between the centres' results and an external reference laboratory (Belgium) was assessed on 1596 triplicate plain blood samples collected on filter paper.results High kappa values (range 0.86-0.97) indicated excel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Last but not least, the reliability of the DAT in terms of reproducibility still needs to be formally evaluated. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, the reliability of the DAT in terms of reproducibility still needs to be formally evaluated. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in settings where parasitological confirmation is not feasible, the freeze-dried DAT together with classical clinical features of VL can be used for diagnosis at a cut-off for positive DAT, which is 1:12,800 as in endemic areas. The DAT is simpler than many other tests but presents severe problems in terms of reproducibility of results, which depends on antigen elaboration [77]. A new antigen elaboration method, the EasyDAT described in 2003, shows the same sensitivity, specificity, and durability as the traditional DAT antigen method but offers the additional advantages of cost reduction and standardization [78].…”
Section: Direct Agglutination Test (Dat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na última década, o DAT tem mostrado em vários estudos sensibilidade de 91 a 100% e especificidade de 72 a 100%. A técnica combina altos níveis de validade intrínseca e facilidade de execução, embora apresente problemas na padronização e controle de qualidade do antígeno e não tenha valor no prognóstico da doença 19 . Uma variação da DAT, o FAST (Fast Agglutination Screening Test), vem sendo testada para aplicabilidade em situações epidêmicas e para inquéritos populacionais 20 .…”
Section: Diagnóstico Imunológico Diagnóstico Imunológico Diagnóstico unclassified