2017
DOI: 10.1177/1757177417733062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-centre prospective internal and external evaluation of the Brompton Harefield Infection Score (BHIS)

Abstract: BHIS provides a novel, internally and externally evaluated score for a patient's risk of SSI after CABG. It enables clinicians to focus on strategies to prospectively identify high-risk patients and improve outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we found the ACRI and BHIS models demonstrated good predictive power of SSI development, we concurred with other studies identifying that NNIS is a poor predictor of SSI after cardiac surgery. 13 21 Both the ACRI and BHIS models were validated in procedure-specific populations (valve 21 and CABG, 22 respectively) which may be why they performed less well than the B-SIR tool which was developed specifically to include patients undergoing various forms of cardiac surgery. This can also suggests that risk profile assessment varies based on the institutions' patient population as previously identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we found the ACRI and BHIS models demonstrated good predictive power of SSI development, we concurred with other studies identifying that NNIS is a poor predictor of SSI after cardiac surgery. 13 21 Both the ACRI and BHIS models were validated in procedure-specific populations (valve 21 and CABG, 22 respectively) which may be why they performed less well than the B-SIR tool which was developed specifically to include patients undergoing various forms of cardiac surgery. This can also suggests that risk profile assessment varies based on the institutions' patient population as previously identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%