Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty

Ivlev, Ilya; Vacek, Jakub; Kneppo, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.075

Cited by 82 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…3 Medikal ekipman seçim kararı, hizmet verilen hasta grubunun sağlık bakımı ve daha sonrasında da yaşam kalitesi üzerindeki önemli etkilerinden dolayı kritik öneme sahiptir. 2 Medikal cihaz seçme kurum ve kuruluş için zaman alıcı ve ileri düzeyde bilgi ve deneyim gerektiren problemli kritik bir süreçtir. Makine-ekipman seçimi için standart bir katalog sisteminin olmaması, çok sayıda kriterin değerlendirilmesi ve yeni bir ekipmanın teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte tanıtılması, problemi daha da komplike bir hale getirebilmektedir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ekokardiyografi Cihazı Seçiminin Yapılması

Eren¹,

Cihan²,

Ayan³

et al. 2017

Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Medical devices are the most budgeted items in hospitals. For this reason, the decision to buy a medical device is one of the critical decisions. In this study, the selection problem of echocardiography device planned to be taken to a cardiology department in a public hospital was discussed. Methods: Criteria affecting echocardiography device selection and available alternative devices were determined by reviewing the relevant literature and taking the opinions of three physicians specializing in cardiology. After the selection criteria were determined, the criteria were weighted by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the best alternative was determined by sorting the alternatives by TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method. Results: The priorities of the alternatives determined for the selection problem of the echocardiography device were found to be %48 for B, %29 for A, and %23 for C, according to the AHP method. With the TOPSIS method, the ideal distance (Si *), negative ideal distance (Si-) and the ideal solution relative (Ci *) values of each decision point were found to be 0, 0.124287 and 1 for B, respectively. Conclusion: According to the method of AHP and TOPSIS, device B is the first alternative.

show abstract

Section: Introductionunclassified

Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ekokardiyografi Cihazı Seçiminin Yapılması

Eren¹,

Cihan²,

Ayan³

et al. 2017

Sağlık Bilimleri Ve Meslekleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A shortfall in the efficacy of the available technology for a particular purpose, in short, mandates (perhaps undesirably) quick clinical decision-making regarding how to make 'the best of a bad situation'. This also raises questions for managers responsible for sourcing new equipment, and the manner in which selection criteria for particular items of radiographic kit are defined and prioritised [31] .…”

Section: R5: "[S] Ometimes the X-ray Gowns Don't Fit For Me That's Imentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient obesity and the practical experience of the plain radiography professional: On everyday ethics, patient positioning and infelicitous equipment

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ivlev, Vacek & Kneppo [39] point at such features of MCDM as complexity of decision-making criteria, high degree of DM's responsibility and uncertainty at every stage of decision-making process. The last one is due to often interfering aims of involved or affected parties, their various policies, different economic, social, technical and organizational environment and consequences of taken decisions.…”

Section: Multicriteria Decision-makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Gawlik

2017

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty

Cited by 82 publications

References 41 publications

Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ekokardiyografi Cihazı Seçiminin Yapılması

Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ekokardiyografi Cihazı Seçiminin Yapılması

Patient obesity and the practical experience of the plain radiography professional: On everyday ethics, patient positioning and infelicitous equipment

Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About