Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps

Garfí, Marianna; Tondelli, Simona; Bonoli, Alessandra

doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.019

Cited by 113 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The methodological framework of MCDA is well suited to the complex nature of environmental decision making; more specifically, waste management decision analysis in terms of the following: (1) It can deal with mixed sets of data, quantitative and qualitative (Liu et al, 2015). This aspect is a distinct advantage especially for developing countries where the data are scarce or include uncertainty (Garfì et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009). (2) It is conveniently structured to enable a collaborative planning and decision-making environment.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing future scenarios for health care waste management using a multi-criteria decision analysis tool: A case study in the Turkish West Black Sea Region

Ciplak

2015

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to identify the best possible health care waste management option in the West Black Sea Region by taking into account economic, social, environmental, and technical aspects in the concept of multi-criteria decision analysis. In the scope of this research, three different health care waste management scenarios that consist of different technology alternatives were developed and compared using a decision-making computer software, called Right Choice, by identifying various criteria, measuring them, and ranking their relative importance from the point of key stakeholders. The results of the study show that the decentralized autoclave technology option coupled with the disposal through landfilling with energy recovery has potential to be an optimum option for health care waste management system, and an efficient health care waste segregation scheme should be given more attention by the authorities in the region. Furthermore, the discussion of the results points out multidisciplinary approach and the equilibrium between social, environmental, economic, and technical criteria. The methodology used in this research was developed in order to enable the decision makers to gain an increased perception of a decision problem. In general, the results and remarks of this study can be used as a basis of future planning and anticipation of needs for investment in the area of health care waste management in the region and also in developing countries that are dealing with the similar waste management problems.Implications: Alternative technologies are not capable to treat some categories of health care wastes, and Turkish practice has to be revised urgently. In doing so, internal health care waste separation is critical for determination of treatment technology. The author verified the methodology in a decision-making framework for a real-world problem. Results indicated that incinerating all health care wastes is not a feasible option due to high cost.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing future scenarios for health care waste management using a multi-criteria decision analysis tool: A case study in the Turkish West Black Sea Region

Ciplak

2015

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Su et al (2007) studied many modern decision-making support systems that already partially consider social factor analysis in addition to expenses and benefits, environmental effects, technical issues, and management aspects. Garfi et al (2009) applied general criteria for human development to the study of different waste management solutions in Saharawi refugee camps (Algeria) and to testing the feasibility of a decision-making method developed for application under particular conditions in which environmental and social aspects must be considered; it presents the equilibrium between social, environmental, and technical impacts (UNDP 2008). Therefore, a proposed evaluation framework is selected with four primary dependence aspects and 33 criteria for evaluation.…”

Section: Hierarchical Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, a proposed evaluation framework is selected with four primary dependence aspects and 33 criteria for evaluation. The four aspects are human development aspect (AS1), social aspect (AS2), economical aspect (AS3), and sustainable development aspect (AS4; Chung and Lo 2003;Hung et al 2007;Khan and Faisal 2008;Tseng 2009;Tseng and Lin 2008;Garfi et al 2009).…”

Section: Hierarchical Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The social aspect (AS2) is explained with the viewpoint that MSWM should gain acceptance from people from all quarters: community, political, health, and environmental groups. Hence, the following are proposed as criteria: local community participation (C19), access to technology for all members of local community (C20), living conditions of local community (C21), respect for local culture (C22), overcoming of discrimination or conflict between different groups in the community (C23), use and acceptance of technology from local community (C24), migration due to poverty and lack of access to resources (C25), health of the community (e.g., food safety, disease reduction, hygiene; C26; Tseng 2009; Tseng and Lin 2008;Garfi et al 2009). …”

Section: Goalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Importance–performance analysis of municipal solid waste management in uncertainty

Tseng

2010

Environ Monit Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate and position the perceptions of importance and performance of municipal solid waste management aspects and criteria. The study results propose dependence relations among four aspects and 33 criteria pertaining to metropolitan Taipei. Evaluation was based on linguistically described preferences and multiple aspects and criteria analysis; in particular, applied fuzzy set theory was used to evaluate linguistic vagueness, and the analytic network process was applied for dependence relations among the aspects and criteria. In order to compile managerial implications and concluding remarks, importance-performance analysis was conducted, using several mathematical techniques applied to the objectives as well as the participation and input of professionals and academicians. Overall results and concluding remarks are discussed.

show abstract

“…The literature on seeking the optimum solution to the waste management problem is mainly focused on multiobjective, multicriteria, and multistakeholder context (Hamalainen et al 1999;Ahluwalia and Nema 2007;Vego et al 2008;Garfì et al 2009;Thabrew et al 2009;Kodikara et al 2010). However, a multistakeholder environment in which the decisions made by any of the stakeholders affect all other stakeholders' strategies has not been explored in the context of a waste stream that is toxic and hazardous on one hand but also offers resource recovery and recycling opportunities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Game Theory–Based Multistakeholder Planning for Electronic Waste Management

Kaushal

Nema

2013

J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholder decision making is needed for implementing policies that affect both initial purchase decisions of electronic gadgets and ultimate decisions about land disposal/recycling or storage of electronic waste. In consumer electronics, a long-term relationship between manufacturer and consumer might lead to contracts that create incentives for consumers to return used electronic gadgets. The result could be more effective economically and environmentally for involved stakeholders like manufacturers, consumers, and society as a whole. If a stakeholder can further obtain more profit through collaborating with others in some coalition, it will be preferred to collaborate rather than participating individually. This paper discusses the noncooperation as well as cooperation of stakeholders and gives a formulation for the calculation of their profits. After that, based on game theory, a scheme to decide which strategy is better suited, gaining the maximum profit, to a stakeholder and also the profit allocation of each stakeholder in the coalitions rationally and impartially is proposed. Results for stakeholders verified the principle that cooperation is better than competition.

show abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps

Cited by 113 publications

References 3 publications

Assessing future scenarios for health care waste management using a multi-criteria decision analysis tool: A case study in the Turkish West Black Sea Region

Assessing future scenarios for health care waste management using a multi-criteria decision analysis tool: A case study in the Turkish West Black Sea Region

Importance–performance analysis of municipal solid waste management in uncertainty

Game Theory–Based Multistakeholder Planning for Electronic Waste Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About