2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-015-1695-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria evaluation of CMIP5 GCMs for climate change impact analysis

Abstract: Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, and the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits you.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regional models, however, have no mechanism for correcting uncertainties and possible errors introduced by global models' simulations. In spite of current uncertainties, especially with respect to simulated and predicted precipitation, the models' projections are being used for the estimation of different climate variables on global as well as regional scales [25,26].…”
Section: Cmip5 Climate Models Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The regional models, however, have no mechanism for correcting uncertainties and possible errors introduced by global models' simulations. In spite of current uncertainties, especially with respect to simulated and predicted precipitation, the models' projections are being used for the estimation of different climate variables on global as well as regional scales [25,26].…”
Section: Cmip5 Climate Models Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting hydrological climate sensitivity 1.41%/ • C for the eastern part of the US is far from the observed values of 6.7%/ • C, while the 0.03%/ • C for the western US is consistent with observation indicating no significant change in precipitation with increasing temperature. In spite of current uncertainties, especially with respect to simulated and predicted precipitation, the models' projections are being used for the estimation of different climate variables on global as well as regional scales [25,26].…”
Section: Cmip5 Climate Models Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties in GCM parameterization and the existence of large biases in raw GCM outputs given the model development assumptions have resulted in overestimation of precipitation (Risley et al , ; Sheffield et al , ; Nasrollahi et al , ). In a regional study over the Pacific Northwest United States, Ahmadalipour et al () showed that raw GCMs over‐estimate summer precipitation and under‐estimate winter temperature. Moreover, current GCMs have a fairly coarse resolution and therefore, are not able to reproduce small‐scale regional climate characteristics (Werner, ; Rana and Moradkhani, ; Rana et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the outputs of these GCMs are coarse in spatial resolution [10,11] and might not be suitable at the basin level, especially for small basins, which require very fine spatial resolution [12,13]. To use the outputs of GCMs at the basin level, downscaling-dynamical and statistical-techniques have been developed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%