Multi-factoriality of dentine hypersensitivity

Stojsin, Ivana; Petrović, Ljubomir; Stojanac, Igor; Drobac, Milan

doi:10.2298/mpns0808359s

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Likewise, there is an overt tendency to shorten the in vivo evaluation period to one year, although observance for an extended period of time is more desirable. 4 Various tests are used to assess the quality of materials for final restorations, such as the Ryge protocol, the CDA system, and modified USPHS criteria. Modified USPHS criteria are widely accepted and are suitable for a long-term clinical evaluation of restorations and also for comparing the results of different studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When these lesions become sclerotic from mineral deposits that occlude the dentin tubules, the tooth becomes insensitive to stimuli. [2][3][4] In the treatment of NCCLs, clinicians most commonly use composites, glass-ionomer cements, or a combination of two restorative materials with the appropriate adhesive systems. Micromechanical retention, preserving tooth structure, good esthetics, and functional features are all aspects when making the choice of material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Three Different Tooth-Colored Materials: Two-Year Results

Stojanac

Premović

Ramić

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IL Stojanac MT Premovic BD Ramic MR Drobac IM Stojsin LM Petrovic Clinical RelevanceMicrofilled composite, nanohybrid composite, and compomer give similar results in treatment of noncarious cervical lesions within a two-year evaluation period. SUMMARYIntroduction: The aim of this two-year prospective clinical study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of three different adhesive esthetic materials in noncarious cervical lesions.Material and Methods: A total of 90 restorations (30 per material) were placed in 30 patients who ranged in age between 18 and 50 years and of both genders, by a single operator with no previous preparation. The restoration of noncarious cervical lesions was done with either a microfilled composite (Esthet.X/Dentsply/De Trey, Konstanz, Germany, and Prime&Bond NT/Dentsply/De Trey), a nanohybrid composite (TetricEvoCeram/Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein, and AdheSE/Vivadent), or a compomer (Dyract eXtra/ Dentsply/De Trey and Xeno III Dentsply/De Trey). All restorations were evaluated by independent examiners using a modified US Public Health Service criteria at baseline and after 12 and 24 months for six clinical categories. Data were analyzed statistically by Pearson's chi- , 2013, 38-1, 12-20 square or the Fisher's exact test at 5% significance level (p,0.05).Results: Results showed that most of the restorations were clinically satisfactory after 12 and 24 months, with no statistically significant differences among the three groups for all evaluated criteria.Conclusion: Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions using composite and compomer materials, combined with the appropriate adhesive systems and properly implemented restorative procedures, gives satisfactory results after a two-year evaluation period.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Three Different Tooth-Colored Materials: Two-Year Results

Stojanac

Premović

Ramić

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a clinical condition with numerous aetiological factors, and its prevalence is widely variable (Haneet & Vandana, ; Cartwright, ; Splieth & Tachou, ; Stojsin, Petrović, Stojanac, & Drobac, ). DH is more prevalent among people between 30 and 40 years old with prevalence rates ranging from 3 to 98% (Splieth & Tachou, ; Costa et al., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and predictive factors of dentin hypersensitivity in Brazilian adolescents

Silva

Lima

Pereira

et al. 2019

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To measure the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in adolescents. Methods The diagnosis was based on self‐report and was confirmed by tactile and evaporative tests. The association between DH and predictor factors was determined using a multivariate model. The sample consisted of 384 adolescents. Results The prevalence was 19.0%. DH prevalence to tactile stimulus was higher in those participants whose toothbrush movement was vertical/horizontal (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.47–0.60, p < 0.001), in the presence of dental biofilm (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.94–3.09, p < 0.001), of non‐carious cervical lesion (OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 2.40–3.18, p < 0.001), of gingival recession (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.44–1.86, p < 0.001) and gyroversion (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.40–1.82; p < 0.001). When DH was diagnosed by evaporative stimulus, there was an association with brush movement in a vertical/horizontal direction (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.66–0.82, p < 0.001), with the use of mouthwash solutions (OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 2.16–3.25, p < 0.001), in the presence of non‐carious cervical lesion (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.57–1.96, p < 0.001), of gyroversion (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.51–1.90, p < 0.001) and gingival recession (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.59–1.99, p < 0.001). Conclusions The prevalence of DH in the sample was worrying, since almost 1 in 5 adolescents had DH. Individuals with DH were more likely to report traumatic dental brushing, and presence of dental biofilm, non‐carious cervical lesion, gingival recession and gyroversion in the affected teeth.

show abstract

“…Kod cervikalnih lezija problem u rekonstrukciji defekta adhezivnim tehnikama nije samo formiranje adhezivne veze sa sklerotičnim dentinom već i trajnost adhezivne veze u uslovima oralne sredine. Stoga je preporuka da se klinička evaluacija cervikalnih lezija izvodi nakon kraćeg vremenskog perioda [13]. Restaurativne procedure koje se koriste u zbrinjavanju cervikalnih lezija: postavljanje ispuna konvencionalnim glas-jonomer cementom (GJC), smolom − ojačanim GJC-om, kompomera, tečnih kompozita, hibridnih kompozita, mikropunjenih kompozita, kompozitnih i porcelanskih faseta, izrada inleja i metal-keramičkih ili bezmetalnih solo krunica, odnosno mostova [14,15].…”

Section: Medicinski Fakultet Novi Sadunclassified

One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations in cervical lesions of different aetiology

Premović¹,

Ramić²,

Stojanac³

et al. 2012

Med pregl

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Multi-factoriality of dentine hypersensitivity

Abstract: Dentin hypersensitivity is a problem that bothers many patients. Many conditions share the symptoms of tooth sensitivity so differential diagnosis is essential for suitable treatment or preventive measures.

Cited by 10 publications

References 13 publications

Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Three Different Tooth-Colored Materials: Two-Year Results

Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Three Different Tooth-Colored Materials: Two-Year Results

Prevalence and predictive factors of dentin hypersensitivity in Brazilian adolescents

One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations in cervical lesions of different aetiology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About