2023
DOI: 10.3390/su151411369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Level Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation for Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Xuzhou City, China

Abstract: Water resources, as an essential natural resource, plays an irreplaceable role in the ecological environment, social economy, and human survival. Water resource carrying capacity (WRCC), as an important indicator of sustainable development, has been widely used to assess the capacity of water resources to support economic and social development. Using Xuzhou City as a case study, the sustainable capacity of water resources in the current (from 2012 to 2020) and future (projected scenarios in 2025 and 2030) sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process of selecting indicators for a comprehensive evaluation of water resource carrying capacity in Zhangye City, the combination of the two weighting methods can solve the problems of subjective limitations and inconsistency with the actual situation. The TOPSIS model is more suitable for the carrying capacity assessment of water resource shortage areas compared with the evaluation methods of the fuzzy comprehensive judgment method and the principal component analysis method [27,28]. Therefore, the results of the study also provide a certain basis for improving the carrying capacity of water resources and play a positive role in formulating reasonable water resource management measures in Zhangye City.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the process of selecting indicators for a comprehensive evaluation of water resource carrying capacity in Zhangye City, the combination of the two weighting methods can solve the problems of subjective limitations and inconsistency with the actual situation. The TOPSIS model is more suitable for the carrying capacity assessment of water resource shortage areas compared with the evaluation methods of the fuzzy comprehensive judgment method and the principal component analysis method [27,28]. Therefore, the results of the study also provide a certain basis for improving the carrying capacity of water resources and play a positive role in formulating reasonable water resource management measures in Zhangye City.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Then, the hardware equipment category is judged, specifically the school library's collection of books. As well as the configuration of equipment in the school classrooms and other factors to comprehensively evaluate, evaluating each category of factors separately and then making an overall evaluation is a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method (Zhang et al, 2023). After the hierarchical division, the relationship of each factor is more apparent, and it is large enough to avoid the occurrence of too small factor weights due to weight normalization.…”
Section: Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may result in unscientific vegetation area planning due to subjective evaluations [21,22]. Therefore, adopting objective and relatively accurate calculation methods to rationalize the allocation of limited water resources and at the same time designing appropriate development modes and thus restoring the vegetation and ecology of arid zones, so as to reduce the uncertainty in the process of calculating the water resource carrying capacity in the traditional sense, is the key to solve this problem [18,23]. In this study, the concept and evaluation system of the natural vegetation water resource design carrying area (NVDA) is proposed based on WRDCC, taking a typical arid area of Minqin County in Gansu Province, China, as a case study to reduce the uncertainty of future water resources and provide a suitable NVDA calculation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%