Multi‐objective Optimization of Benzamide Derivatives as Rho Kinase Inhibitors

Abstract

Despite recent advances in Computer Aided Drug Discovery and High Throughput Screening, the attrition rates of drug candidates continue to be high, underscoring the inherent complexity of the drug discovery paradigm. Indeed, a compromise between several objectives is often required to obtain successful clinical drugs. The present manuscript details a multi-objective workflow that integrates the 4D-QSAR and molecular docking methods in the simultaneous modeling of the Rho Kinase inhibitory activity and acute toxicity of Benzamide derivatives. To this end, the pIC /pLD ratio is considered as the response variable, permitting the concurrent modeling of both properties and representing a shift from classical step-by-step evaluations. The 4D-QSAR strategy is used to generate the Grid Cell Occupancy Descriptors (GCODs), and Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods as the model fitting techniques. While the statistical parameters for the PLS model do not meet established criteria for acceptability, the SGB model yields satisfactory performance, with correlation coefficients r =0.95 and r pred=0.65 for the training and test set, respectively. Posteriorly, the structural interpretation of the most relevant GCODs according to the SGB model is performed, allowing for the proposal of 139 novel benzamide derivatives, which are then screened using the same model. Of these 9 compounds were predicted to possess pIC /pLD ratio values higher than those for the employed dataset. Finally, in order to corroborate the results obtained with the SGB model, a docking simulation was formed to evaluate the binding affinity of the proposed molecules to the ROCK2 active site and 3 chemical structures (i. e. p6, p14 and p131) showed higher binding affinity than the most active compound in the training set, while the rest generally demonstrated comparable behavior. It may therefore be concluded that the consensus models that intertwine the 4D-QSAR and molecular docking methods contribute to more reliable virtual screening and compound optimization experiments. Additionally, the use of multi-objective modeling schemes permits the simultaneous evaluation of different chemical and biological profiles, which should contribute to the control a priori of causative factors for the high attrition rates in later drug discovery phases.

Computational evidence for nitro derivatives of quinoline and quinoline N-oxide as low-cost alternative for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection

“…It would be therefore of huge interest to investigate these properties in the preliminary stages to in silico design of safer and more efficient drugs. Hence, the ADMET evaluations involve sequential and iterative assessments of the efficacy, PK, PD, metabolic and toxicological properties in the model of potential drug candidates 54 . From the ADMET results, the theoretical parameters of toxicity (LD 50 ) were obtained for each compound: N-4-Q (2.53 mol kg −1 ), N-4-QO (2.56 mol kg −1 ), CQ (2.95 mol kg −1 ), CQO (2.68 mol kg −1 ), HCQ (2.66 mol kg −1 ), HCQO (2.69 mol kg −1 ).…”

New in silico insights into the application of the (hydroxy)chloroquine with macrolide antibiotics co-crystals against the SARS-CoV-2 virus

“…Along this line, the absorptiondistribution-metabolism-excretion-toxicity (ADMET) evaluations involve sequential and iterative assessments of the e cacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolic and toxicological properties in the model of therapeutic agents, and hence contributing to design safer and more e cient drugs. [42] The ADMET analysis was carried out in order to evaluate the toxicity of our compounds, singleand co-crystals, under investigation. According to our results in Table 3, the LD 50 value found for ER, 2.23 mol.kg -1 , indicates more toxicity in relation to other single-and co-crystal compounds.…”

Graph-Based Feature Selection Approach for Molecular Activity Prediction

“…Previous literature on the construction of QSAR models shows that the most used feature selection methods are the following: chi-square (CS), , gain ratio (GR), , information gain (IG), , unbalanced correlation score (UCS), mutual information (MI), , standard correlation score (Fisher score, FS), , F-score (FS) base ranking, − Shannon entropy (SE), , recursive feature elimination (RFE), − and the fast clustering-based feature selection algorithm (FAST) …”