2019
DOI: 10.1002/peng.20184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐Relaxation Test to Characterize PE Pipe Performance

Abstract: A new concept is proposed, which uses results from a multi‐relaxation test to characterize transition of deformation mechanisms in polyethylene (PE) pipes, for plastic deformation from the amorphous phase only to the involvement of the crystalline phase. The former mechanism is believed to lead to brittle fracture, while the latter to ductile fracture. This phenomenon is believed to be related to the transition from ductile to brittle (DB) fracture that has been observed in creep tests of PE pipes by reducing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this phenomenon is observed, it is supposed to explain the scenario reported previously in Ref. [ 16 ], which is detailed below.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While this phenomenon is observed, it is supposed to explain the scenario reported previously in Ref. [ 16 ], which is detailed below.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The test results were used to explain the difference in the measured critical quasi-static stresses for the deformation transitions. The latter was reported previously [ 16 ] for the same six PE pipes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between the MR test and that used by Hong et al is that the former uses a single specimen for all stress relaxation stages, while the latter uses multiple specimens, one for each stress relaxation stage. The latter approach was also used in our previous work on PE pipe specimens [20], from which critical deformation for the mechanism transition was found to be consistent with that using MR test on a single specimen [21]. However, the use of a single specimen has the advantage of avoiding inconsistency in the stress decay during stress relaxation, which can be caused by, for example, dimensional inconsistency among specimens.…”
Section: Multi-relaxation (Mr) Testmentioning
confidence: 93%