2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale characterization of pore evolution in a combustion metamorphic complex, Hatrurim basin, Israel: Combining (ultra) small-angle neutron scattering and image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional details of the data reduction procedures for both neutron scattering and the use of imagery may be found in (Anovitz et al, 2009, Anovitz et al, 2013, Anovitz and Cole, 2015, Wang et al, 2013.…”
Section: Sans/usansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details of the data reduction procedures for both neutron scattering and the use of imagery may be found in (Anovitz et al, 2009, Anovitz et al, 2013, Anovitz and Cole, 2015, Wang et al, 2013.…”
Section: Sans/usansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2013) detected a reduced (relative) contribution to the total porosity from small scale pores in metamorphic rocks that underwent higher degrees of metamorphism. This implies that smaller pores tended to close fi rst during the combustion and other metamorphic processes the rocks underwent over time.…”
Section: Observations Of Precipitation In Poresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recent work has shown that small and ultra-small angle neutron and X-ray scattering can be combined with, e.g., traditional SEM-BSE analysis to obtain a measurement of pore sizes that range seven orders of magnitude (Wang et al 2013). This series of techniques removes one of the issues with the pore size characterization techniques described above in that the sample is not ground to a powder.…”
Section: Observations Of Precipitation In Poresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard petrographic techniques, such as backscattering SEM, and TEM cover only certain ranges of length scales (Fig. 7.7), and quantification of pore structures for thin-section-sized samples is difficult, especially at high image resolutions [80].…”
Section: Structure Of Sedimentary Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface fractal dimension is a sample specific parameter. It can vary even for similar rocks, which suggests that structures of pore/grain interfaces depend on the detailed history of a given rock, as well as on the materials forming the interfaces [80]. Both surface and mass fractal structures have been documented, the latter describing the statistical distribution of pores within the sample.…”
Section: Structure Of Sedimentary Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%