2009
DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0b013e3181b9b8c0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Nanoparticle Immunoassay for 5-Fluorouracil on the Olympus AU400 Analyzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…95 The risk of bias was difficult to judge due to incomplete reporting, particularly in the domain of flow and timing. There was a high risk of bias for patient selection for two out of the four studies, 89,95 and it was unclear for the other two (S. Salamone, personal communication). 129 This was because there were no assurances given that inappropriate exclusions of patients or samples were made.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…95 The risk of bias was difficult to judge due to incomplete reporting, particularly in the domain of flow and timing. There was a high risk of bias for patient selection for two out of the four studies, 89,95 and it was unclear for the other two (S. Salamone, personal communication). 129 This was because there were no assurances given that inappropriate exclusions of patients or samples were made.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two research papers 89,95 and two abstracts, 128,129 were found to include information relevant to whether or not My5-FU can be considered equivalent to LC-MS/MS and HPLC. However, one of the abstracts was considered part of the same study as one of the papers.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations