2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria decision support to evaluate potential long-term natural gas supply alternatives: The case of Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, following 2015, this trend altered since the aggregate demand for natural gas constantly grew and it peaked at the level of 5.1 bcm in 2019. Androulaki and Psarras (2016), provide a detailed analysis of the natural gas market in Greece and describe its importance in terms of security of supply. Based on the updated National Energy and Climate Plan (2019), the overall nat-ural gas consumption in Greece is projected to reach 7.5 bcm until 2025.…”
Section: The Role Of Natural Gas-fired Units In Greecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, following 2015, this trend altered since the aggregate demand for natural gas constantly grew and it peaked at the level of 5.1 bcm in 2019. Androulaki and Psarras (2016), provide a detailed analysis of the natural gas market in Greece and describe its importance in terms of security of supply. Based on the updated National Energy and Climate Plan (2019), the overall nat-ural gas consumption in Greece is projected to reach 7.5 bcm until 2025.…”
Section: The Role Of Natural Gas-fired Units In Greecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n. p i is the relative weight of the i th function u i (g i ). Thus, for a given alternative supply solution α, g(α) and u[g(α)] represent the multicriteria vector of performances and the global value of the alternative solution respectively [10,11]. A pair of criteria g i , g j is preferentially independent from the rest of the criteria when the trade-offs between the g i and g j criteria are not dependent on the values of the rest of the criteria.…”
Section: Additive Value Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Διαχείριση ανθρώπινων πόρων (Spyridakos et al, 2000;González-Araya et al, 2002;Grigoroudis and Zopounidis, 2012) • Αξιολόγηση προτάσεων έργων (Jacquet-Lagrèze, 1995; Beuthe et al, 2000) • Περιβαλλοντική διαχείριση (Siskos and Assimakopoulos, 1989;Hatzinakos et al, 1991;Demesouka et al, 2013Demesouka et al, , 2017 • Διαχείριση υπηρεσιών υγείας (Manolitzas et al, 2013a(Manolitzas et al, , 2013bDoumpos et al, 2016) • Αξιολόγηση η-διακυβέρνησης (Siskos et al, 2013a(Siskos et al, , 2013bGiannakopoulos et al, 2010) • Διαχείριση καινοτομίας (Lakiotaki and Matsatsinis, 2012;Delias et al, 2013) • Ενεργειακή ανάλυση (Diakoulaki et al, 1999;Androulaki and Psarras, 2016;Angelopoulos et al, 2017) • Παιδεία (Manouselis and Sampson, 2002;Matsatsinis and Fortsas, 2005;Krassadaki et al, 2015) • Στρατηγικό μάνατζμεντ (Mastorakis and Siskos, 2015) • Αγροτικό μάρκετινγκ (Siskos and Matsatsinis, 1993;Baourakis et al, 1993Baourakis et al, , 1996Matsatsinis et al, 1999Matsatsinis et al, , 2000Matsatsinis et al, , 2007Siskos, 2001, 2003) • Συμπεριφορά καταναλωτή (Siskos et al, 1995a(Siskos et al, , 1995bBaourakis et al, 1995;Kettani et al, 1998;Matsatsinis and Samaras, 2000;Manouselis and Matsatsinis, 2001;Matsatsinis, 2002;Lakiotaki et al, 2009Lakiotaki et al, , 2011 • Μάνατζμεντ πωλ...…”
Section: σύντομη αναφορά σε πραγματικές εφαρμογέςunclassified