2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcp.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensionalidad del Habla Interna y su relación con las percepciones anómalas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluative/critical inner speech, in contrast, would be expected to relate more strongly to rumination, shame, and perfectionism ( Flett et al, 2002 , Orth et al, 2006 ). The gender difference observed for evaluative/critical inner speech in the present data – with higher scores in female participants – is consistent with greater rates of rumination in women ( Nolen-Hoeksema & Jackson, 2001 ) and with findings from the previous VISQ ( Tamayo-Agudelo et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evaluative/critical inner speech, in contrast, would be expected to relate more strongly to rumination, shame, and perfectionism ( Flett et al, 2002 , Orth et al, 2006 ). The gender difference observed for evaluative/critical inner speech in the present data – with higher scores in female participants – is consistent with greater rates of rumination in women ( Nolen-Hoeksema & Jackson, 2001 ) and with findings from the previous VISQ ( Tamayo-Agudelo et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It may be that dialogicality acts as a “core” feature of inner speech, and the other VISQ factors mediate its relation to other variables. Alternatively, it may be that the concept of dialogicality is liable to varying interpretations, leading to inconsistent performance across samples: for example, in Spanish translations of the original VISQ ( Perona-Garcelán et al, 2017 ) a further dialogic factor needed to be added that explicitly referred to inner speech in terms of position of self in a dialogue (see also Tamayo-Agudelo et al, 2016 ). In our experience, English-speaking users of the scale have typically interpreted dialogic items to both include dialogues with oneself and dialogues with another (indeed, the focus of a Vygotskian understanding of dialogicality is arguably in structure, rather than the identity of interlocutors), but it is possible that cultural understandings of dialogue will differ considerably depending on the language used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of studies have explored the relations between the phenomenology of inner speech and AVH. This has been done in both clinical (de Sousa et al, 2016; Hurlburt, 1990; Langdon et al, 2009) and non-clinical (Alderson-Day et al., 2014; Perona-Garcelán et al., 2017; Tamayo-Agudelo et al, 2016) samples. We focus here on research relating to clinical populations, as it remains unclear if the findings from non-clinical samples can be generalized to clinical samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%