2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifrequency electromagnetic geophysical tools for evaluating the hydrologic conditions and performance of evapotranspiration barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these technologies employed for detecting underground utilities are ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors [147]. However, the low resolution of GPR and EMI sensors makes data interpretation problematic [148]. In addition, due to their limited sensitivity, GPR and EMI sensors have difficulty detecting small or non-metallic utilities, such as plastic pipes and fiber-optic cables.…”
Section: The Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these technologies employed for detecting underground utilities are ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors [147]. However, the low resolution of GPR and EMI sensors makes data interpretation problematic [148]. In addition, due to their limited sensitivity, GPR and EMI sensors have difficulty detecting small or non-metallic utilities, such as plastic pipes and fiber-optic cables.…”
Section: The Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [9] and has been widely employed in several works. Some recent research in geophysical and agricultural science show its application [10] , [11] , [12] . Therefore, our test consists in the measurement of the dielectric permittivity of the soil under test (SUT), with different water content percentages, through our TDT sensor system directly inserted in the soil under analysis, compared with the dielectric permittivity estimation formula given by Topp and the permittivity obtained ( Fig.…”
Section: Validation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various surface geophysical methods are directly or indirectly sensitive to VWC. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is strongly sensitive to VWC, as water content typically dominates soil dielectric permittivity, which in turn controls radar wave velocity (e.g., Mangel et al, 2022 ). Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FDEM) are both techniques for mapping two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D/3D) subsurface bulk electrical conductivity (EC) variations that can be used for moisture estimation if porewater possesses an electrical contrast from the soil (e.g., Shanahan et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%