Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures 2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.711527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodality image guidance system integrating X-ray fluoroscopy and ultrasound image streams with electromagnetic tracking

Abstract: This work presents an integrated system for multimodality image guidance of minimally invasive medical procedures. This software and hardware system offers real-time integration and registration of multiple image streams with localization data from navigation systems. All system components communicate over a local area Ethernet network, enabling rapid and flexible deployment configurations. As a representative configuration, we use X-ray fluoroscopy (XF) and ultrasound (US) imaging. The XF imaging system serve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Alternatively, a study of EM-based tracking of a TTE probe found 3D TRE of 8.81 mm. 19 Since TRE measures error within the registered image space, it is critical that it remains below a certain margin. Otherwise, depicted device-anatomy relationships in the co-registered display become unreliable and may result in patient injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16 Alternatively, a study of EM-based tracking of a TTE probe found 3D TRE of 8.81 mm. 19 Since TRE measures error within the registered image space, it is critical that it remains below a certain margin. Otherwise, depicted device-anatomy relationships in the co-registered display become unreliable and may result in patient injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, an optical TTE probe tracking technique for echo/x‐ray co‐registration by Marinetto et al yielded mean 3D TREs between 2.1 mm and 3.0 mm for various anatomical phantom models, 18 while Rasche et al reported a mean 3D RMS error of 1.85 mm 16 . Alternatively, a study of EM‐based tracking of a TTE probe found 3D TRE of 8.81 mm 19 . Since TRE measures error within the registered image space, it is critical that it remains below a certain margin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation