2014
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2014.967715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Nash Equilibriums and Evaluation of Strategies. New Application of McDm Methods

Abstract: There are two different approaches in this study with different implications. The first approach and the main aim of this study is a methodological framework. There are different frameworks in solving game theory topics involving at least two Nash Equilibriums. This study presents a new framework for developing this part of game theory with MCDM framework. The authors believe that at least there is a perspective or paradigm behind each game theory topic, leading to the development of strategies accordingly. Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, it is interesting to combine some aggregation operators Liu, Chen & Wang, 2018; with the PF-DNMA method or extend this method to q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Applying the PF-DNMA method to deal with other MCDM problems, such as machine tool selection (Aghdaie, Hashemkhani Zolfani & Zavadskas, 2013), material selection (Yazdani et al, 2016;Hashemkhani Zolfani, Maknoon & Zavadskas, 2015), carpenter manufacturer selection (Stevic et al, 2018), is a challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, it is interesting to combine some aggregation operators Liu, Chen & Wang, 2018; with the PF-DNMA method or extend this method to q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Applying the PF-DNMA method to deal with other MCDM problems, such as machine tool selection (Aghdaie, Hashemkhani Zolfani & Zavadskas, 2013), material selection (Yazdani et al, 2016;Hashemkhani Zolfani, Maknoon & Zavadskas, 2015), carpenter manufacturer selection (Stevic et al, 2018), is a challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to select the appropriate methods for multi-criteria and calculation of the weights of the criteria or their combinations. After reviewing the MCDM tools, WASPAS and SWARA be useful in decision-making in different areas: analysing surveys, planning future objects, selecting sites for buildings (Hashemkhani Zolfani et al, 2015;Mardani et al, 2017).…”
Section: Selection Of the Plot Location By Swara And Waspas-svnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…some of them may be maximizing (the situation improves when the value of the indicator increases), while the others are minimizing (the situation is deteriorating when the value of the indicator increases). Given this contradictory situation, multicriteria methods are best suited for the quantitative assessment of the state of a complex phenomenon, and in recent years these methods have been applied more widely for solving various tasks due to their universality (Ginevičius et al, 2011;Mardani et al, 2015;Mardani et al, 2016;Zolfani et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%