2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-specimen absolute paleointensity determination: An optimal protocol including pTRM normalization, domain-state correction, and alteration test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
210
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
210
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected 250°C as a temperature typically exploited in palaeointensity experiments for these samples: Thellier 7,8 palaeointensity experiments were interpreted between 100 and 280°C (ref. 26) while multi specimen style (MSP) experiments 9,10 were done at 250°C (ref. 26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We selected 250°C as a temperature typically exploited in palaeointensity experiments for these samples: Thellier 7,8 palaeointensity experiments were interpreted between 100 and 280°C (ref. 26) while multi specimen style (MSP) experiments 9,10 were done at 250°C (ref. 26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directional information is generally straightforward to obtain from various recorders, including well-dated lavas and (lake) sediments for shorter timescales and sedimentary sequences for reconstructions going further back into geological history. Despite recent methodological progress [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] , however, acquiring reliable absolute palaeointensity data remains a formidable task. Only materials that acquired their remanent magnetization by cooling in the Earth's ambient magnetic field are suited for absolute palaeointensity determinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end Fabian & Leonhardt (2010) improved the MSP-DB protocol by adding three extra heating steps to identify and correct for these potential domain state effects, resulting in the MSP-DSC (domain state corrected) method. Furthermore, a check for potential alteration was added Table 3.…”
Section: Multispecimen Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a different thermal approach, Dekkers & Böhnel (2006) proposed a method exploiting multiple sister specimens and reducing the number of heating steps compared to Thellier-style protocols. This multispecimen method (MSP) was later refined by Fabian & Leonhardt (2010) to account for potential changes in the magnetic domain state during the experiment. To avoid thermally induced alteration altogether, a relative palaeointensity technique frequently used on sediments, the pseudo-Thellier method, was recently calibrated to provide absolute estimates of the palaeofield's intensity from volcanic samples and proved to be a valuable addition to the palaeointensity toolbox (de Groot et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%