2014
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale Change Point Inference

Abstract: Summary. We introduce a new estimator, the simultaneous multiscale change point estimator SMUCE, for the change point problem in exponential family regression. An unknown step function is estimated by minimizing the number of change points over the acceptance region of a multiscale test at a level α. The probability of overestimating the true number of change points K is controlled by the asymptotic null distribution of the multiscale test statistic. Further, we derive exponential bounds for the probability of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
514
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(522 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
(293 reference statements)
5
514
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared FPOP to several other segmentation algorithms: pDPA (Rigaill 2010), PELT (Killick et al 2012), Binary Segmentation (BinSeg), Wild Binary Segmentation (WBS; Fryzlewicz 2012), and SMUCE (Frick et al 2014). We ran pDPA and BinSeg with a maximum number of changes K = 52, WBS and SMUCE with default settings, and PELT and FPOP with the SIC penalty.…”
Section: Speed Benchmark: 4467 Chromosomes From Tumour Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We compared FPOP to several other segmentation algorithms: pDPA (Rigaill 2010), PELT (Killick et al 2012), Binary Segmentation (BinSeg), Wild Binary Segmentation (WBS; Fryzlewicz 2012), and SMUCE (Frick et al 2014). We ran pDPA and BinSeg with a maximum number of changes K = 52, WBS and SMUCE with default settings, and PELT and FPOP with the SIC penalty.…”
Section: Speed Benchmark: 4467 Chromosomes From Tumour Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, functional pruning is computationally more demanding than inequality based pruning. We thus decided to empirically compare the performance of FPOP to PELT (Killick et al 2012), pDPA (Rigaill 2010), Binary Segmentation (BinSeg), Wild Binary Segmentation (WBS) (Fryzlewicz 2012) and SMUCE (Frick et al 2014).…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation Of Fpopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See for example Yao (1988), Lavielle (2005), Killick et al (2012) and Davis et al (2006). Finally, the segmentation of the data is obtained as the one that minimises a penalised version of this cost (see also Frick et al 2014, for an extension of these approaches).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%