2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-019-00305-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale spatiotemporal patterns of crime: a Bayesian cross-classified multilevel modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that spatial influence on crime might have a scale-free organization, where no particular unit of organization emerges as particularly important. This interplay of scales, emerging from diverse mechanisms of social interaction is well known 31,33,34,59 ; this study underscores the importance of these multi-scale processes to determine the optimal influence neighborhoods that vary across the city. Also, the influence of crime seems to behave as a diffusive process only on average, hence is not very useful for prediction of individual events at specific locations (See Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…These results suggest that spatial influence on crime might have a scale-free organization, where no particular unit of organization emerges as particularly important. This interplay of scales, emerging from diverse mechanisms of social interaction is well known 31,33,34,59 ; this study underscores the importance of these multi-scale processes to determine the optimal influence neighborhoods that vary across the city. Also, the influence of crime seems to behave as a diffusive process only on average, hence is not very useful for prediction of individual events at specific locations (See Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Ref. [28] proposed a multi-level model to explore the spatial-temporal patterns of crime in different spatial scales of area. They provide guidance for the construction of cognitive models of ship behavior.…”
Section: Multi-scale Modeling Of Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some instances it may make sense to consider an additive measurement error structure, represented as, * = + , where ( ) ≠ 0 if the errors are systematic. This is the case when crime rates are log-transformed; a common strategy used to normalise their often right-skewed distribution (Sutherland et al, 2013;Whitworth, 2011), to interpret effects in relative terms (Goulas & Zervoyianni, 2013;Witt & Witte, 2000), or as a result of employing generalised linear models where logs are used as the link function, such as Poisson models (Quick, 2019;Sampson et al, 1997). Crucially, log-transforming crime rates also has the effect of transforming the observed multiplicative measurement error into an additive mechanism, since: log( * ) = log( ) = log( ) + log( ).…”
Section: Prevalence and Nature Of Measurement Error In Police Recordementioning
confidence: 99%