2018
DOI: 10.1101/268540
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensory stimuli improve relative localisation judgments compared to unisensory auditory or visual stimuli

Abstract: 17Observers performed a relative localisation task in which they reported whether the second 18 of two sequentially presented signals occurred to the left or right of the first. Stimuli were 19 detectability--matched auditory, visual, or auditory--visual signals and the goal was to 20 compare changes in performance with eccentricity across modalities. Visual performance 21 was superior to auditory at the midline, but inferior in the periphery, while auditory--visual 22 performance exceeded both at all location… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the present results can be explained in terms of the lack of retinovisuomotor calibration of the auditory space with blindness and by the specificities of the multisensory mechanisms of spatial calibration that replace visual calibration in the blind (Lewald, 2002a, 2002b, 2013; Zwiers et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2003). In this context, it is important to note that in normal-sighted persons, visual localization acuity is maximal in the foveal region and decreases substantially with increasing eccentricity (Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman, Wood, & Bizley, 2018; Mateeff & Gourevich, 1983; Perrott, Costantino, & Cisneros, 1993). As mentioned earlier, auditory localization acuity also increases with increasing eccentricity (Blauert, 1997; Carlile et al., 2016; Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2018; Makous & Middlebrooks, 1990; Mills, 1958; Röder et al., 1999; Wood & Bizley, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that the present results can be explained in terms of the lack of retinovisuomotor calibration of the auditory space with blindness and by the specificities of the multisensory mechanisms of spatial calibration that replace visual calibration in the blind (Lewald, 2002a, 2002b, 2013; Zwiers et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2003). In this context, it is important to note that in normal-sighted persons, visual localization acuity is maximal in the foveal region and decreases substantially with increasing eccentricity (Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman, Wood, & Bizley, 2018; Mateeff & Gourevich, 1983; Perrott, Costantino, & Cisneros, 1993). As mentioned earlier, auditory localization acuity also increases with increasing eccentricity (Blauert, 1997; Carlile et al., 2016; Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2018; Makous & Middlebrooks, 1990; Mills, 1958; Röder et al., 1999; Wood & Bizley, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is important to note that in normal-sighted persons, visual localization acuity is maximal in the foveal region and decreases substantially with increasing eccentricity (Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman, Wood, & Bizley, 2018; Mateeff & Gourevich, 1983; Perrott, Costantino, & Cisneros, 1993). As mentioned earlier, auditory localization acuity also increases with increasing eccentricity (Blauert, 1997; Carlile et al., 2016; Charbonneau et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2018; Makous & Middlebrooks, 1990; Mills, 1958; Röder et al., 1999; Wood & Bizley, 2015). Furthermore, the cross-modal bias (i.e., the ability of a visual signal to influence the localization of an auditory target) and the ventriloquism effect (i.e., the visual capture of sounds with presentation of spatially incongruent bimodal targets) have been shown to be maximal at central locations and to decrease with eccentricity (Charbonneau et al., 2013; Hairston et al., 2003; Lewald & Guski, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%