2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.110981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate calibration of spectroscopic sensors for postharvest quality evaluation: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
135
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the data are not as clean as expected when sampling and instrument noise and typing mistakes, among others have a greater impact where the use or pre-processing or any other correction does not improve the accuracy of the analytical results (e.g., inaccuracies can never be modelled) [35][36][37][38][39]. Therefore, a word of caution: MVA is not a "black box" or "push button" approach where the modelling will automatically do the rest [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Analysing and Interpreting The Information-the Mathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, the data are not as clean as expected when sampling and instrument noise and typing mistakes, among others have a greater impact where the use or pre-processing or any other correction does not improve the accuracy of the analytical results (e.g., inaccuracies can never be modelled) [35][36][37][38][39]. Therefore, a word of caution: MVA is not a "black box" or "push button" approach where the modelling will automatically do the rest [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Analysing and Interpreting The Information-the Mathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors have highlighted that one of the most important issues to be considered during sampling is related to how good the uncertainty depending on the purpose is [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. One important issue to consider (and remember) is that the uncertainty of the measurement that arose from sampling is non-negligible [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. This is even more significant when raw materials (e.g., food ingredients) and environmental samples (e.g., soil and water) are collected, where the uncertainty of the sampling exceeds the analytical contribution [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: The Source Of Information—the Experiments and The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dubey and Jalal [ 20 ] reported on an improved sum and difference histogram texture feature to identify the species and variety of fruit and vegetables based on HSV (Hue, Saturation, Value) images. Abundant literatures have demonstrated appropriate algorithms that could further improve the results [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Ronald and Evans [ 25 ] classified apple varieties using Naive Bayes algorithms, which could obtain higher accuracies than those of principal components analysis (PCA), fuzzy logic, and MLP-Neural.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%