2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate stochastic comparisons of multivariate mixture models and their applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fit Measures. According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) there are more than 20 fit indices and no agreement which to report for measuring the hypothesized model. According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) and Byrne (2009)…”
Section: Figure No 3: Sem Model Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fit Measures. According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) there are more than 20 fit indices and no agreement which to report for measuring the hypothesized model. According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) and Byrne (2009)…”
Section: Figure No 3: Sem Model Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) and Meyers et al (2006), there are more than 20 fit indices and no agreement which to report for measuring the hypothesized model. According to Balakrishnan et al (2016), Ryu (2014), and Byrne (2009), these measures have been characterized into four indices categories such as: 1) absolute fit index, 2) Relative fit index, 3) Noncentrality based index and 4) Parsimonious fit index. Complete cut off results for the considered indices of this study have been reported in Table 5.…”
Section: Fit Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Balakrishnan et al (2016) and Rutherford et al (1988), the results of Confirmatory factor analysis, which were tested on the basis of a theory for all the factors and indicators presented in Table 5. The summarized CFA results of all the 25 constructs of measured and structural models have followed the limit for all the used indices.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the researchers have considered six moderating variables, such as innovation in information technology, fiber optics Internet technology, the speed of processors, innovation in telecommunication technology, smartphone technology, and generation (1G-5G) technologies, in which every moderating variable have three operational constructs. Table A2 in Appendix A exhibited the summarized results of structural and measurement models for all of the factors and items, which followed the cut-offs, such as Parsimonious fit indices (PCFI > 0.75, PGFI > 0.75 and PNFI > 0.75), absolute fit indices (GFI > 0.95, χ 2 -low, probability < 0.05, χ 2 /df-relative χ 2 < 5.0), relative fit-indices (NFI > 0.90, IFI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95), and Non-centrality based fit indices (RNI > 0.95, CFI > 0.95 and RMSEA < 0.05) that specifies the good model fitness [154,155].…”
Section: Structural Equation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the considered factors and indicators on the basis of prior theory [11,[153][154][155]. According to Byrne [147] and Meyers et al [156], there are more than twenty (20) fit indices, and there is no consensus as to which and how many are to be reported to measure the hypothesized model.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%