1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7992(89)90038-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenicity studies on paracetamol in human volunteers II. Unscheduled DNA synthesis and micronucleus test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, several studies have failed to show any effect of smoking. One study has even reported no differences in the induction of micronuclei between smokers and nonsmokers, 25 and others have shown that smokers had less DNA damage than nonsmokers. 26 On the other hand, some authors have postulated increased DNA damage in heavy smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, several studies have failed to show any effect of smoking. One study has even reported no differences in the induction of micronuclei between smokers and nonsmokers, 25 and others have shown that smokers had less DNA damage than nonsmokers. 26 On the other hand, some authors have postulated increased DNA damage in heavy smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This assay has been used to evaluate the exposure levels of the human population to mutagenic or genotoxic agents [26-30] as well as in cell cultures to determine the mutagenic potential of drugs and/or natural compounds [31-33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobacco is known to contain various genotoxic chemical, and smoking is a well-documented cause of cancer including the oral cavity 32 . For this reason, smokers and non-smokers are investigated comparatively as smoking is supposed to be relevant to genotoxin exposure 33 . Our results appeared to demonstrate no effect in micronuclei frequency between smokers and non-smokers, either to patients or to control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%