1982
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.2.12.1501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations at theSaccharomyces cerevisiae SUP4tRNATyrLocus: Isolation, Genetic Fine-Structure Mapping, and Correlation with Physical Structure

Abstract: The SUP4 tRNATYr locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been studied by the isolation and characterization of mutations at the SUP4 gene which result in the loss of suppressor function. Most of the mutations act as single-site mutations, whereas about a third of the mutations are deletions of the entire gene. Two meiotic fine-structure maps of the gene were made. The first mapping technique placed 10 mutations plus the sup4+ anticodon on a map by a measurement of levels of recombination between pairs of mutatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included each of the three possible mutations of all five D-loop uridine residues; U4 of the acceptor stem; A9, A13, and A22 of the D loop; residues 44, 45, and 47 of the variable loop; C59 of the T loop; and G62 of the T stem. These results are consistent with, and substantially extend, previous analyses of functional variants of SUP4 oc (Kurjan and Hall 1982;Kohalmi and Kunz 1992), yeast tRNA Arg(CCG) (Geslain et al 2003), and an E. coli alanine amber suppressor tRNA (Hou and Schimmel 1992). In contrast, residues that did not tolerate any single mutations included those in conserved tertiary pairs (U8-A14, R15-Y48, G18-U55, G19-C56, and U54-A58), emphasizing the requirement of the L-shaped tertiary fold of the tRNA for activity.…”
Section: Sup4 Oc Is Highly Tolerant Of Mutationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These included each of the three possible mutations of all five D-loop uridine residues; U4 of the acceptor stem; A9, A13, and A22 of the D loop; residues 44, 45, and 47 of the variable loop; C59 of the T loop; and G62 of the T stem. These results are consistent with, and substantially extend, previous analyses of functional variants of SUP4 oc (Kurjan and Hall 1982;Kohalmi and Kunz 1992), yeast tRNA Arg(CCG) (Geslain et al 2003), and an E. coli alanine amber suppressor tRNA (Hou and Schimmel 1992). In contrast, residues that did not tolerate any single mutations included those in conserved tertiary pairs (U8-A14, R15-Y48, G18-U55, G19-C56, and U54-A58), emphasizing the requirement of the L-shaped tertiary fold of the tRNA for activity.…”
Section: Sup4 Oc Is Highly Tolerant Of Mutationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…7C). One mutant (mutB Box-tDNA Tyr ) carries a C/G mutation in the B Box of the Pol III promoter, inhibiting TFIIIC binding and transcription (Kurjan and Hall 1982;Baker et al 1986;Pebernard et al 2008), and the other (DtDNA Tyr ) lacks the tRNA-coding sequence (Pebernard et al 2008). It seems that RpL7 only binds to this tRNA gene if it is being actively transcribed.…”
Section: Rps Are Enriched On Centromeric Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SUP2 gene is a member of a family of eight tRNA^^"^ genes of identical structural sequence, and de novo Ty3 transposition upstream of another member of the tRNA^^"^ gene family had also been detected ). In addition, transcriptional properties of the tRNA^^"^ gene family have been studied extensively (Kurjan and Hall 1982;AlHson et al 1983;Baker et al 1986;Kassavetis et al 1989;Kassavetis et al 1990). …”
Section: Recovery Of Ty3 Insertions Into Target Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2A)] was changed to G in the SUP2 gene {sup2G56] and the sup2 + b gene {sup2G56 + b]. The C56^G mutation in box B was shown previously to eliminate suppression by the gene for a tRNA^^"^ ochre suppressor (Kurjan and Hall 1982). In vitro this mutation was shown to decrease transcription of the SUP4 tRNA^y^ gene to 5% of wild type (Allison et al 1983) by severely reducing the ability of box B to bind TFIIIC (Baker et al 1986).…”
Section: The Ability To Bind Polymerase III Transcription Factors Is mentioning
confidence: 99%