Mutual Trust Under Pressure: Civil Justice Cooperation in the EU and the Rule of Law

Hazelhorst, Monique

doi:10.1007/s40802-018-0112-y

Cited by 3 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4 En ce sens il faut examiner, même brièvement, les décisions rendues par les juges de la rue de Montpensier en 2004 puis en 2006, qui ont participé à l'élargissement de la gamme des instruments de contrôle du conseil. 5 La décision du 10 juin 2004 retient certes l'incompétence de la cour constitutionnelle pour analyser la conformité à la Constitution de dispositions législatives qui appliquent des directives d'effet direct, mais elle assure que son contrôle pourrait néanmoins s'opérer pleinement si la loi de transposition contenait une « disposition expresse contraire à la Constitution ».…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…In einem ersten Abschnitt werde ich Rechtsstaatlichkeit als Verbundnorm betrachten, die, wie andere Bereiche im Unionsrecht, etwa im Grundrechtsschutz oder im europäischen Verwaltungsrecht, aus Rechtserkenntnisquellen um sie herum schöpft, aber im Ergebnis autonom gehandhabt wird. 5 Hierbei sollen die Kategorien Normstruktur, Normadressaten und Normgehalt helfen, zu einem ersten Zwischenfazit zu gelangen.…”

Section: Gegenstandunclassified

“…Mise en place en 1957 avec le traité de Rome, la procédure d'infraction avait été envisagée plutôt comme une procédure technique, généralisée et centralisée visant à garantir que les règles du droit européen soient observées. 5 La gestion de la procédure et la représentation des interêts de l'Union étaient confiées à la Commission, quien vertue de l'Article 17 TUE -veille à l'application du droit de l'Union. Pendant longtemps -comme souligne Aleksandros Tsadiras -la procédure ressemblait alors plutôt à un « jeu de marchandage élitiste et bipolaire » entre la Commisssion et l'État membre en défaut.…”

Section: Die Legitimation Ihres Schutzesunclassified

“…Pour que ces exigences s'appliquent, les parties doivent respecter les règles d'ordre public et de bonnes moeurs prescrites par les normes juridiques objectives. 5 Comme mentionné précédemment, selon la théorie de Fouillé, un contrat signifie nécessairement la justice. Cette conclusion nous conduit à l'analyse de la relation entre le contrat et la catégorie abstraite de la justice.…”

Section: Gass István *1unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Untitled

2022

Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2002, the Faculties of Law of the Georg-August University of Göttingen and ELTE Budapest decided to establish the "Deutsche Rechtsschule", which since then has allowed numerous ELTE students to study the basics of German law with German professors and to become acquainted with the German way of legal thinking here in Budapest. Many of them have also been able to obtain a subsequent LL.M. degree in Göttingen. Over the past two decades, cooperation between the two Faculties has expanded considerably. One of its fruits is the biennial series of conferences, a muchappreciated form of interaction between our faculties. In these conferences, we analyse legal institutions and concepts from different perspectives that cut across all areas of law. The results of these workshops can be found in several previous issues of the Annales, and in volumes published in Göttingen. This issue contains the papers based on the presentations at this year's conference, for which we have chosen the omnipresent topic of "Wandel des Rechtsstaats", partly due to the turbulences we have witnessed in Europe and globally since the last conference early in 2020.Having chosen the theme for the conference, we decided to launch an incentive to deepen our cooperation with the Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris, and to invite our esteemed French colleagues to the conference as well. It was also in 2002 that we started a similar cooperation with the Faculty of Law of Panthéon-Assas, thanks to the great efforts of the late Professor Attila Harmathy and Professor Márta Dezső. In 2006, this cooperation even developed into a Master program (Maîtrise 1) in "Droit Comparé/ Droit Hongrois", attracting many students from ELTE. Not a few of them also went to Paris after graduating in Budapest to continue their studies in a "Maîtrise2" cycle in Paris.The conference, with a first part in French and a second part in German, was organised in May 2022 with the generous support of the National Agency for Research, Development and Innovation under the Mecenatúra programme. 1 I am positive that the papers will, to some extent, convey to our readers the wonderfully lively and exciting atmosphere of the days we spent together reflecting on the changes in the concept of the rule of law. * F. Rozsnyai, Krisztina, Prof. dr., head of the organising committee, vice dean for international relations of the Faculty of Law, ELTE Budapest. 1 The papers of the third section, which was held in English, can be found in issue 2023/1 of ELTE Law

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Gegenstandunclassified

Section: Die Legitimation Ihres Schutzesunclassified

Section: Gass István *1unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Untitled

2022

Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…30 Dans la littérature, l'opinion a aussi apparue que l'exigence relatives aux défaillances systémiques ou généralisées devraient être mise à l'écart en matières civiles, parce qu'au contraire aux matières pénales il n'y a pas besoin d'évaluer prospectivement le risque des violations des droits fondamentaux (comme en cas de la remise d'une personne à un autre État membre dans le but de poursuite pénale ou pour l'exécution d'une peine privative de liberté), mais le juge peut établir rétrospectivement sur la base de preuves déjà disponibles si la décision dont la reconnaissance et exécution sont requises a porté atteinte aux droits fondamentaux. 31 Cependant, il est à noter qu'une telle distinction entre les matières pénales et civiles n'a pas été faite par la CJUE.…”

Section: Indépendance Judiciaire Et La Coopération Judiciaire En Mati...unclassified

L’État de droit dans une dimension multiétatique: L’État de droit et le droit international privé

Szabados¹

2022

Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most often, the concept of rule of law is conceived as a phenomenon of public law and relatively little attention has been paid to the significance of rule of law in private law, let alone private international law. Even so, the goal of this article is to highlight that the requirements of rule of law have an impact on the method and the application of rules of private international law. The neutrality and the mechanical character of the classical conflict-of-laws method seems to reflect the formal concept of rule of law, primarily focusing on legal certainty and predictability in the course of the designation of the applicable law. However, even the classical method has permitted the appearance of certain substantive elements of rule of law, in particular the respect of human rights, in private international law. The ordre public clause and the application of overriding mandatory provisions opened this possibility. Moreover, due to the requirement of respecting fundamental rights and in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, in the legal literature the view has been expressed that the methodology of private international law has undergone a change and it is oriented now towards the method of recognition that applies in more and more areas of private international law.

show abstract

The Shifting Approach of the Court of Justice of the European Union towards the Principle of Mutual Trust and the Impact of the Rule of Law

Ozoráková

2022

European Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The principle of mutual trust is based on the idea that there is mutual confidence between Member States that their national legal systems are in line with the European Union law and are able to provide similar protection of the shared values. However, the experience of last years has brought multiple challenges questioning these fundamental building blocs. This article focuses on understanding the role of fundamental rights and the rule of law in limiting the principle of mutual trust as suggested by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It discusses the shift in the approach of the CJEU towards the limitations, exploring whether the recent case law suggests that the current crises of values, including the systemic violations of the rule of law and fundamental rights play a crucial role in widening the limits of mutual trust.

show abstract

Mutual Trust Under Pressure: Civil Justice Cooperation in the EU and the Rule of Law

Cited by 3 publications

References 26 publications

Untitled

Untitled

L’État de droit dans une dimension multiétatique: L’État de droit et le droit international privé

The Shifting Approach of the Court of Justice of the European Union towards the Principle of Mutual Trust and the Impact of the Rule of Law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About