2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02635-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MWA Versus RFA in HCC: Superior? Equivalent? Will We Ever Know?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual necrosis volume is also influenced by several factors: lesion position, proximity to great vessels or other critical structures and generator parameters. [23] Although MWA is an effective and safe alternative to LR [24], its superiority to RFA has not yet been proven [15], perhaps a study comparing necrosis volumetric assessment in both procedures could help decide which one could show lower LTP.Study limitations Retrospective, monocentric study based on a small group of patients, limited to the evaluation of patients with a single BCLC 0 or A liver lesion treated with radiofrequency ablation and inconsistent imaging follow-up. A prospective trial with longer time interval for follow-up is needed to determine recurrence free-survival and LTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual necrosis volume is also influenced by several factors: lesion position, proximity to great vessels or other critical structures and generator parameters. [23] Although MWA is an effective and safe alternative to LR [24], its superiority to RFA has not yet been proven [15], perhaps a study comparing necrosis volumetric assessment in both procedures could help decide which one could show lower LTP.Study limitations Retrospective, monocentric study based on a small group of patients, limited to the evaluation of patients with a single BCLC 0 or A liver lesion treated with radiofrequency ablation and inconsistent imaging follow-up. A prospective trial with longer time interval for follow-up is needed to determine recurrence free-survival and LTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%